Cruz Says Obama Not Interested In Defending The Country

Tsing Tao · Nov 16, 2015

The French should have taken the bodies of the terrorists and put them in an open grave with slaughtered pigs, broadcasting it to the world like Blackjack Pershing supposedly did (sans the broadcast). "Anyone committing acts of terror on our soil gets buried with pigs."

Bet you anything the acts stop. Use their religion against them. No one is going to blow themselves up for "paradise" when they know they'll go to hell for it via the pigs.

fhl · Nov 16, 2015

You will never guess how the U.S.

is ´vetting´ Syrian refugees

American Thinker, by Ed StrakerOriginal Article

Posted By: JoniTx- 11/16/2015 6:56:20 AM Post Reply

Both Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio have called for the US to accept more Syrian refugees, as long as they are properly "vetted", of course. But what does it mean to "vet" a refugee? Normally, if someone wants to come into the United States, say, from France or Germany, our government can check with the French or German government to see if this person has a criminal record, or even is who he says he is. But when it comes to refugees from Syria, what is called "vetting" relies mostly on one source of information: the refugee.

more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...ss_how_the_us_is_vetting_syrian_refugees.html

Ditch · Nov 16, 2015

Tsing Tao said:
The French should have taken the bodies of the terrorists and put them in an open grave with slaughtered pigs, broadcasting it to the world like Blackjack Pershing supposedly did (sans the broadcast). "Anyone committing acts of terror on our soil gets buried with pigs."

Bet you anything the acts stop. Use their religion against them. No one is going to blow themselves up for "paradise" when they know they'll go to hell for it via the pigs.

The Russians used by bury islamic terrorists in a pig skin in Afghanistan. No doubt the leftist mob will consider this inhumane.

ETcallhome · Nov 16, 2015

fhl said:
You will never guess how the U.S.

is ´vetting´ Syrian refugees

American Thinker, by Ed StrakerOriginal Article

Posted By: JoniTx- 11/16/2015 6:56:20 AM Post Reply

Both Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio have called for the US to accept more Syrian refugees, as long as they are properly "vetted", of course. But what does it mean to "vet" a refugee? Normally, if someone wants to come into the United States, say, from France or Germany, our government can check with the French or German government to see if this person has a criminal record, or even is who he says he is. But when it comes to refugees from Syria, what is called "vetting" relies mostly on one source of information: the refugee.

more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...us_is_vetting_syrian_refugees.html[/QUOTE]yes, the USA has changed. In years past we needed a lot of bad asses who could handle a gun, and an unli

Ditch said:
The Russians used by bury islamic terrorists in a pig skin in Afghanistan. No doubt the leftist mob will consider this inhumane.

How did that war in Afghanistan finally end up for the good old tough no nonsense Soviet Union?

Tsing Tao · Nov 16, 2015

ETcallhome said:
How did that war in Afghanistan finally end up for the good old tough no nonsense Soviet Union?

It was horrific, but not because of them burying enemies with pigs (assuming they did).

ETcallhome · Nov 16, 2015

Tsing Tao said:
It was horrific, but not because of them burying enemies with pigs (assuming they did).

where did they get the pigs? Neither moslems or jews eat them. And nowadays, even many people in Iowa have cut back. There's no love lost between me and pigs. But shouldn't we save a few for old times sake, or at least biodiversity?

otherwise, seems like a waste to import pigs just to bury them with your enemies.

Scataphagos · Nov 16, 2015

ETcallhome said:
like a waste to import pigs just to bury them with your enemies.

The way I heard the story (don't know whether it's true)... but Pershing had a number of Muslims to face a firing squad. He lined up all of them except one, then had the shooters dip their bullets in pig blood. Executed all but the one, then let the one go free and told him to "go back home and spread the word about how these died".

See.... that way you could kill THOUSANDS of them bastards without sacrificing more than 1 pig.

Sounds efficient to me.

ETcallhome · Nov 16, 2015

Scataphagos said:
The way I heard the story (don't know whether it's true)... but Pershing had a number of Muslims to face a firing squad. He lined up all of them except one, then had the shooters dip their bullets in pig blood. Executed all but the one, then let the one go free and told him to "go back home and spread the word about how these died".

See.... that way you could kill THOUSANDS of them bastards without sacrificing more than 1 pig.

Sounds efficient to me.

If you like efficiency, Auschwitz was a pretty well run organization. Very little waste. (other than human potential)

achilles28 · Nov 16, 2015

ETcallhome said:
where did they get the pigs? Neither moslems or jews eat them. And nowadays, even many people in Iowa have cut back. There's no love lost between me and pigs. But shouldn't we save a few for old times sake, or at least biodiversity?

otherwise, seems like a waste to import pigs just to bury them with your enemies.

Loyek u dumb turd. Turn off Bill Maher and come back to reality.

Scataphagos · Nov 16, 2015

ETcallhome said:
If you like efficiency, Auschwitz was a pretty well run organization. Very little waste. (other than human potential)

Auschwitz was the epitome of evil, in spite of Hitler's irrational hatred of Jews. Executing Muslim combatants is ridding the world of vermin.

Is "efficiency" the real issue?