Then it probably won't work for you. You have to believe in your strategy.. But I do not think you can rebuild such a winning formula for finding successful stocks just based on statistics like O'Neill have done it.
Then it probably won't work for you. You have to believe in your strategy.. But I do not think you can rebuild such a winning formula for finding successful stocks just based on statistics like O'Neill have done it.
The main idea as I know came from reverse engineering the very successful stocks to capture those profits for future stocks which should be found then by this custom made CANSLIM method. But I do not think you can rebuild such a winning formula for finding successful stocks just based on statistics like O'Neill have done it. There are too many other variables in play that can influence a stock/company their performance/success. Just do not believe that this can work out. Those successful CANSLIM traders I just might guess it is because of the law of big numbers, that some successful traders picking the right stocks at the right time are shown (in such competitions).
I know I sound like a broken record by maintaining a previous post similar to this, but I came across an article from CBS News back in 2010 which called into the question the claims of great performance from CANSLIM and seemed to insinuate a question of O'Neill's credibility too. I hate to be that overly skeptical guy but I want to be damn sure that I am not wasting my time by reading "How To Make Money In Stocks" and learning CANSLIM.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dont-confuse-strategy-with-outcome/
Main parts: "O'Neil has twice tried to run a mutual fund based on the system. He first tried in the '60s with some immediate success, but then the market crashed in 1968-69, taking his fund down as well. The fund had a total loss of -53.6 percent from 1969-74, compared with a loss of 18.8 percent for the S&P 500. O'Neil sold the fund in 1975 with just $6 million in assets, down from a peak of $49 million."
"In 1992, O'Neil launched his New USA Growth Fund, which was managed by David Ryan, an O'Neil protege who won the stock-picking contest known as the U.S. Investing Championship in 1985, 1986 and 1987. However, the fund showed lackluster results. According to Barron's, the fund had a total return of 3 percent from April 1992 through June 1994, versus 17.4 percent for the S&P 500. It met a quiet death as well, with O'Neil transferring the fund's assets to the MFS Emerging Growth Fund (MFEGX)."
"Finally, we have the CAN SLIM Select Growth Fund (CANGX), which was launched in late 2005. Despite the AAII claim of "gains made every year regardless of bull or bear market performance," CANGX lost money in both 2006 (-4.3 percent) and 2008 (-20.5 percent). Through June 30, 2010 it had lost 6.7 percent. And over the period from January 2006 through June 2010, the fund produced a total loss of just over 7 percent."
"Morningstar classifies CANGX as a mid-cap growth fund. Thus, we can compare its performance to the MSCI US Midcap 450 Index. That index produced a total loss of just over 3 percent for the period. Once again, we see that achieving alpha is a lot more difficult than it might appear to be."
If CANSLIM works then why hasn't O'Neill (the strat's founder) been able to profit and use it successfully? Shouldn't he be worth way more than he currently is if his strategy worked? To me it seems that the bulk of his money has come from IBD rather than his strategy, (correct me if I'm wrong).
I'd like to hear your opinions and feedback.
I know I sound like a broken record by maintaining a previous post similar to this, but I came across an article from CBS News back in 2010 which called into the question the claims of great performance from CANSLIM and seemed to insinuate a question of O'Neill's credibility too. I hate to be that overly skeptical guy but I want to be damn sure that I am not wasting my time by reading "How To Make Money In Stocks" and learning CANSLIM.
Imho,the most important aspect of Oneils system is the money management and position sizing methodology.t
What I find lacking in most investment book is how and when to exit a trade. Even Minervini's books don't spend a lot of time and space on exit strategies.This is a familiar caveat. I don't dispute it but it does make you wonder why investment books don't lead with money mgmt and position sizing. Not very sexy I suppose, doesn't sell books and probably not that meaningful until you land in a world of shit.
It's been years since I've studied CANSLIM, but from what I remember it was relatively simple. It's not 100% mechanical--there's a bit of personalizing and subjectivity involved. But one could read the book (or even a good summary) and start applying it almost immediately. Sounds like Minervini's method is a lot more complex and subjective. Do you just buy and hold with all your accounts until you reach the "Eureka!" moment 2 to 6 years later?O'Neill has been improved upon by Mark Minervini's How to Trade like a Stock Market Wizard which provides an extensive and logical explanation of CanSlim applied to battlefield conditions. He's a boastful guy and not to everyone's taste but he's a genius and a terrfic writer. Even if you end up following another strategy, Minervini explores market details in ways you won't find in many books. Running a successful mutual fund is a different business and the great momentum players are gunslingers dedicated to process and risk control. I've never spent time with this book without major lights coming on. Admittedly, I subscribe to Marketsmith and I'm giving myself two years to become conversant with Minervini's approach.
...
7. Book has some very beginner level risk management concepts.
O'Neill has been improved upon by Mark Minervini's How to Trade like a Stock Market Wizard which provides an extensive and logical explanation of CanSlim applied to battlefield conditions. He's a boastful guy and not to everyone's taste but he's a genius and a terrfic writer. Even if you end up following another strategy, Minervini explores market details in ways you won't find in many books. Running a successful mutual fund is a different business and the great momentum players are gunslingers dedicated to process and risk control. I've never spent time with this book without major lights coming on. Admittedly, I subscribe to Marketsmith and I'm giving myself two years to become conversant with Minervini's approach.