Quote from Makis:
For what it's worth, for 9 out of 10 job openings in real HFT shops, with everything else being equal, candidates from 3M are more preferable that candidates from IBanks.
Actually, most HFT job descriptions nowadays indicate "prefer candidates from tech companies than banks", but that is in the real world. Here whoever can BS the most is the best guy to build a trading system.
Quote from j2ee:
May be you believe these job posts are fake?
http://jobs.efinancialcareers.com/job-4000000001163003.htm
Quant Trader
Ideal candidates will possess:
Strong modeling and C++ development skills will be highly regarded. (so only phd can do programming!?)
A proven track record, with a minimum Sharpe ratio of 3+, ideally 4+. (ho ibank experience, proved record right?)
A strong academic background (ho not really have to be phd right?)
In-depth knowledge of quantitative finance (ibank experience or related right?)
http://jobs.efinancialcareers.com/job-4000000001151135.htm
High Frequency Data Developer
Minimum Bachelors in Computer Science or related field. Masters preferred. (ho not phd again!?, would you be too disappeared?)
4+ years of work experience preferably with a financial firm. (ho, they say they care about if you worked in financial firm or not, not university phd experience...ho no..)
Quote from hftvol:
This below is the typical "let's catch the idiots" type of job ad. Nobody in their right mind who has the luxury to call 2+ sharpe ratio (non hft, 5+ hft) strategies his/her own should EVER fall for those offers. Those guys are harvesting strategy ideas and once you walk them into their office your death is sealed. They may either abuse you as coding monkey, if you know how to program well, or let you sit around for a while before you get "let go". I heard the same stories over and over and it does not matter whether we talk about small hft shops or the Millenniums of the hedge fund industry.
Quote from j2ee:
They still can do it as long as clients give them permission to do so. Then there is a very big grey color for them to workaround.
Quote from Equalizer:
This would have to be one of the funniest threads on ET. EVER.![]()
Clearly your meds ain't working (remember those deleted maniacal rants of yours in the MC .net thread?).Quote from hftvol:
funny, as you seem to say that in every thread in which you add zero value, participate not at all, but troll and wait till the page count reaches 30+ before you unpack your ax. This is a fucking website with mostly total idiots and morons and I would love to be booted off the site. Admin do you hear me? I am done with this thread. What a waste of time. Carry on morons!!!
Quote from hftvol:
that I strongly disagree with and have never heard before. For trading architecture development yes, for strategy development a resounding no. You would not be fumbling around in the way you are if you had managed risk for prop books for years and understood market dynamics. I am saying that because that is what most hft shops are after, I get 2-3 calls by head hunters a week who try to lure me to hft shops. The reason I decline to even speak to houses such as Getco is that their compensation structure stinks big time. You get paid mostly discretionary bonuses which are very loosely tied to the performance your strategies generate. If your strategies perform badly you are out, if they perform greatly out still end up with your relatively measly 400-500k even if you generated 20 bucks in a year. Compensation structures such as that are heavily stacked in favor of the firm and I do not see how I end up with a better deal than running on my own. Plus your IP is out the door, as soon as you walk in with strategy ideas or a new algorithm it is taken apart and gone.
Fact remains that most hft houses fumble to hire those with direct market experience, be it on the prop trading, market making (preferred) or systematic trading side of things. Please tell us how a Physics Phd adds value to a hft team. He/she may understand how to sample and analyze data from a statistical and mathematical perspective but he/she knows nothing about market dynamics, extreme events and market reaction to such events, you can't just tell anyone to take a look at some time series for a few weeks and voila, there you go, you created a new micro market dynamics expert. And anyway, hft algorithms are extremely simplistic, complexity wise, no need for an IT wiz kid.
Quote from hftvol:
my last post to you (because I think you got enough advice, time to put in some of your time to get to work on your part):
This below is the typical "let's catch the idiots" type of job ad. Nobody in their right mind who has the luxury to call 2+ sharpe ratio (non hft, 5+ hft) strategies his/her own should EVER fall for those offers. Those guys are harvesting strategy ideas and once you walk them into their office your death is sealed. They may either abuse you as coding monkey, if you know how to program well, or let you sit around for a while before you get "let go". I heard the same stories over and over and it does not matter whether we talk about small hft shops or the Millenniums of the hedge fund industry.