Just pointing out those salient facts you always avoid.Quote from gaj:
max, please stop defending cramer. thanks.
No, actually RIGHT, by his rules he can't put in a stop. And that fact is germane to the 24.5% you complain about.Quote from gaj: He can't even put in a stop.
WRONG.
"He chose not to." Exactly. And you have to take that into consideration. Whether he believes in them or not is immaterial. The fact is, a five day trading ban and one month mandatory hold would seriously hamper any money manager. "He didn't have to," so goes your "argument." But he did and the 24.5% results are most likely less then they would have been otherwise.Quote from gaj:he COULD have set up his paramaters to put in a stop. he chooses not to. he "doesn't believe in stops".
"shut up my ass, and do the research?" LOL! Where did I ever print my beliefs about believing or not believing Cramer "doesn't believe in stops?" I believe the belief system of your ass has got an unbelievable problem.Quote from gaj:don't believe that "he doesn't believe in stops"? fine. shut up your ass, and do the research. the quote is out there, in cramer's writings.
And after analyzing the restrictions, I think his performance is hampered by those restrictions. And he still beat the majority of fund managers that were not burdened by those restrictions.Quote from gaj:
24.5% with those restrictions doesn't sound so bad.
funny - last week, you were saying that "that (his performance) obviously stinks".
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84461&perpage=6&pagenumber=6
