cramer 2007 pick(s)

Quote from max401:

Sure, sure more Cramer bashing. Do give a call when you have amassed anything remotely close to the 100 million + that Cramer has.
More...


Max

If you were getting phone calls the day before upgrades/downgrades were coming out with that info you too would have amassed over 100 million....its not that hard to pick up the phone...hear that goldman is upgrading the semis.....buy a boatload of em...then when the news comes out sell into the gap ups....he did a lot of business/commission with large brokerages, so they fed him info.....also nice when you are long a stock, and then call your 2 friends David and Maria at CNBC and tell them to mention live on the air about a takeover rumor involving your stock...the guy is a fraud....once he stopped getting info and actually had to trade for himself he bailed.....if he had an ounce of skill he would still be managing money....instead he comes on tv and leads herds of sheep into the slaughterhouse....
 
Quote from EPrado:

Max

If you were getting phone calls the day before upgrades/downgrades were coming out with that info you too would have amassed over 100 million....its not that hard to pick up the phone...hear that goldman is upgrading the semis.....buy a boatload of em...then when the news comes out sell into the gap ups....he did a lot of business/commission with large brokerages, so they fed him info.....also nice when you are long a stock, and then call your 2 friends David and Maria at CNBC and tell them to mention live on the air about a takeover rumor involving your stock...the guy is a fraud....once he stopped getting info and actually had to trade for himself he bailed.....if he had an ounce of skill he would still be managing money....instead he comes on tv and leads herds of sheep into the slaughterhouse....
More...


are there any news articles or stuff on the web that support that claim?
 
Quote from Danulous:

what does this have to do with his picks. his picks are interesting, and at least he can establish a position and defend it...rather than just going into a trade for no reason or just because the technicals say so....

his growth plays are #1:NYX #2:AAPL #3:I Forgot.
Do you disagree with them?...
More...



#3
CSCO.....

he recommends CSCO at 28,I remember this stock at 17, all he did was bash it...Now at 28 he loves. Doesnt make any sense.
 
probably did bash it until better news came out. but he was right on nyx and aapl in middle of last year. actually, i think he liked csco in september or october. it might still be a good buy, but i'm not doing it. lol
 
Quote from S2007S:

#3
CSCO.....

he recommends CSCO at 28,I remember this stock at 17, all he did was bash it...Now at 28 he loves. Doesn't make any sense.
More...

http://247wallst.blogspot.com/2006/08/jim-cramer-endorsing-cisco-csco.html

Wednesday, August 09, 2006
Jim Cramer Endorsing Cisco (CSCO)
On Cisco Systems (CSCO)

Jim Cramer on his "Stop Trading" called it "The New Annointed Tech Stock" as the one everyone wants to get behind and that it was going to $22 in a hurry. He said it also has visibility.
 
Quote from gaj:

hey max - that doesn't explain why his action alerts portfolio has only matched the market over the last 6 years. or why it underperformed the market last year.

actually, the posts above for cramer's predictions are right on target. he's no more or less accurate for the long haul than a random dart. however, he IS remarkably uncanny at going ga-ga long at tops, and going ga-ga "sell it all!" at bottoms. those who worked with him knew it, and he admits it in his (great) book, _confessions_...
More...
Action Alerts I don't know about, but look at his own "Worst Picks Overall" list:

http://madmoney.thestreet.com/index.cfm?page=picklists&list=4

The top loser, WLT, is down 45%. But (if there wasn't extenuating circumstances to a stock like WLT) I gotta ask you, who would keep a loser and continue to ride it down for a 45% loss? Rule of thumb is 5-10% on my swings or longer term trades.

Now, WLT. The company declared a $24.70 dividend, hence the huge whack it took in the share price. Why Cramer's staff has that on the Worst Picks List at a 45% negative is a wonder. Maybe he his performance is better than what is shown by his idiot staff.
 
a lot of his viewers keep losers :/ they also buy at a bad price

news in stocks change... people shouldn't lose that much if they follow their stocks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top