Covidiots - Compilation

exGOPer said:
Citation needed. And don't claim you got thousands of studies but won't post a single link to even one of them.



Great sample size there, the big number FOUR!!

And no response on the Ivermectin study thread? Why?
More...
No citation provided. GO AND FIND IT YOURSELF. It’s available for you to find. If Google is censoring your search results I suggest you use a different SE.

In case you are a bot - and didn’t understand the image you posted about the 6 NPCs and their FOUR VACCINES (lolllll) - you took FIVE (5!!!!! Lol) and will take MOAR when they tell you to - thats the significance of the number.

I’m not your ChatGPT where you can just pump me for a question and I’ll spout out an answer. There are so many studies confirming the safety and efficacy of Ivm in treating COVID. That you refuse to seek them out is your problem.
 
LacesOut said:
No citation provided. GO AND FIND IT YOURSELF. It’s available for you to find. If Google is censoring your search results I suggest you use a different SE.

In case you are a bot - and didn’t understand the image you posted about the 6 NPCs and their FOUR VACCINES (lolllll) - you took FIVE (5!!!!! Lol) and will take MOAR when they tell you to - thats the significance of the number.

I’m not your ChatGPT where you can just pump me for a question and I’ll spout out an answer. There are so many studies confirming the safety and efficacy of Ivm in treating COVID. That you refuse to seek them out is your problem.
More...


AGAIN, ignored the Ivermectin study, you think I am not noticing your deflections?
 
exGOPer said:
AGAIN, ignored the Ivermectin study, you think I am not noticing your deflections?
More...
No idea what you are talking about.

All you do is deflect.
16 dead from neurological conditions following the initial Pfizer clinical trial - NO BIG DEAL. Trying to Bury the data for 75 years - NO BIG DEAL.
 
LacesOut said:
No idea what you are talking about.

All you do is deflect.
16 dead from neurological conditions following the initial Pfizer clinical trial - NO BIG DEAL. Trying to Bury the data for 75 years - NO BIG DEAL.
More...

You can't post a study and when studies are linked for you, you are unable to read them

And then you cite absolute numbers without using percentages

High quality science right there.

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19...onger-duration-still-futile-covid-trial-finds
 
LacesOut said:
High quality. LOL. The majority of the patients in the trial started treatment after 5 days. FAIL. IvM needs to be dosed within 24-48 hours of symptoms. This is well known.

FAIL
More...

What?
day2.png
 
LacesOut said:
60% of participants received the study drug within 5 days of symptom onset. That means 40% didn’t. And I’m sure a gang of them got it in day 3,4. LOL
FAIL
More...

You are just making stuff up now, total guess work because this is another proof that your snakeoil doesn't work.
 
exGOPer said:
You are just making stuff up now, total guess work because this is another proof that your snakeoil doesn't work.
More...
Are you retarded? It’s in the study limitations. Do you even read the garbage shit studies that you don’t understand before you post them?
“High quality science right there!!!”
LOLLLLLLLLL
Says a guy with ZERO science background.
Who read the clinical trials from Pfizer and Moderna and then took FIVE (!!!!!!!!!) experimental shots and is ready to take MOAR.

FAIL
EPIC FAIL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top