Covid Vaccine Scam, Ivermectin is the cure (Compilation)

Please…you have no clue how science works. What is your science background? What diploma did you earn? In what scientific field have you worked? In what lab did you ever perform rigorous scientific experiments?

:

Here it comes, your repetitive ad hominem rant that doesn't address a SINGLE point I made, not one. wHAt iS yOuR bAcKGroUnD!!! Do you know how online forums works? What the fuck is your background to cite some random study?

I have enough background to understand how OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS work, do you understand what they are? Why would you trust a 'study' sponsored by Brazil's government who mismanaged Covid?
 
So we are back to that you don't have single proper peer-reviewed study in a major medical journal showing that Ivermectin is effective at preventing or treating Covid -- just a bunch of nonsense from pre-print pay-to-play publications. On top of this all of your "large studies" have been debunked for having absolute fabricated crap as their data sets.

You are aware that mainstream studies of Ivermectin for treating Covid are still underway by respected medical institutions and universities. However -- any of the results to date -- show that Ivermectin is totally ineffective for preventing or treating Covid. We will see what comes from the large-scale Duke University study which is still underway.


Ivermectin as Potential COVID-19 Treatment Gets Studied at Duke University
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/202...covid-19-treatment-studied-at-duke-university

Jan. 21, 2022 -- Doctors at Duke University are leading a national study to test whether three drugs could effectively treat COVID-19 — including ivermectin — according to The News & Observer.

The study, which began last summer, is attempting to provide a comprehensive assessment of the controversial treatment. Ivermectin has been celebrated by some as a potential COVID-19 treatment and ridiculed by others who say there’s no proof that the drug works against the coronavirus, and in fact, could be harmful to patients.

“There were some early studies that showed that it could potentially be helpful with COVID-19, but they were not large enough to be definitive,” Adrian Hernandez, MD, one of the study leaders and a cardiologist at Duke University, told the newspaper.

“So we want to know either way, is it potentially beneficial or not,” he said.

Ivermectin is typically used to kill parasites in animals, including heartworm in dogs and gastrointestinal worms in horses and cows. Since the late 1980s, the drug has been used in humans to treat parasitic infections and other illnesses.

However, it’s not approved to treat COVID-19, and the FDA has warned that using the drug, especially formulations made for animals, can be dangerous. The FDA has received multiple reports of people who needed medical attention and hospitalization after taking ivermectin meant for livestock.

At the same time, people have been trying the drug in hopes that it will treat COVID-19. That’s why it’s important to answer the major questions around it, Hernandez said.

“We should understand if there are any benefits,” he told the newspaper. “And if not, we should be able to report that back out to the public clearly and note what shouldn’t be done.”

The Duke study is testing three drugs under ACTIV-6, which is one of a series of studies of potential COVID-19 treatments and vaccines launched by the National Institutes of Health. The goal is to find treatments and vaccines that could make COVID-19 as manageable as the seasonal flu.

The two other drugs in the study are fluvoxamine, a medicine often prescribed for depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and fluticasone furoate, a steroid medication prescribed through an inhaler for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

All three drugs are approved for use in humans, are proven to be safe, and are easy to use at home, the newspaper reported. They also rarely interact with other medications, which could make them good options to treat mild to moderate cases of COVID-19.

“Just like we’re trying to do testing at home, we’re looking at how can you conveniently do treatment at home,” Hernandez said.

About 2,500 people from across the U.S. have taken part in the ACTIV-6 study so far. To qualify, study participants must be 30 or older, have tested positive for the coronavirus within the previous 10 days, and have at least two symptoms. They receive an overnight package with one of the drugs or a placebo, and report how they’re feeling each day by phone or online.

Researchers at Duke are looking for evidence that the drugs either shorten the time that people feel sick or prevent them from getting worse and needing hospitalization, the newspaper reported.

With the recent surge in new COVID-19 cases due to the Omicron variant, enrollment in the study has picked up in recent weeks, the newspaper reported. Hernandez said the study team may have enough data to release initial results within in a month or so.

More information is available on the ACTIV-6 study website.
Waiting for you to show that 39 of the 76 studies in the growing meta analysis which shows tremendously positive results for prophylaxis and early treatment, have been retracted.
You can’t but you lied about it.
Why do you lie?
Why?
Your vaccine is garbage in real time.
Ivermectin works safely and effectively in real time.

You have zero science background or knowledge. ZERO. You are like the Twitter poster who is a gardener, stay at home mom, and a vaccine expert telling people to get boosted.

Utterly brainwashed lying nefarious morons.
 
If you read his posts from a few years ago and then his recent posts you might conclude, as I have, that GWB is suffering from some kind of "episode". He went over the edge around the end of 2019.
GWB and I occasionally agree on some things. It’s just that his wife works for J&J and so he has the big Pharma dick cucking him all day long.
 
Here it comes, your repetitive ad hominem rant that doesn't address a SINGLE point I made, not one. wHAt iS yOuR bAcKGroUnD!!! Do you know how online forums works? What the fuck is your background to cite some random study?

I have enough background to understand how OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS work, do you understand what they are? Why would you trust a 'study' sponsored by Brazil's government who mismanaged Covid?
LOL.
Your point is that Ivermectin is horse dewormer. That shows you know absolutely nothing. But you have an agenda. Little troll living at home.

Thank you for proving that you have no science knowledge whatsoever.
Now go through the Pfizer study while you are waiting for your 4th booster you dumbfuk
 
LOL.
Your point is that Ivermectin is horse dewormer. That shows you know absolutely nothing. But you have an agenda. Little troll living at home.

Thank you for proving that you have no science knowledge whatsoever.
Now go through the Pfizer study while you are waiting for your 4th booster you dumbfuk

Its settled business that not one person on the left or right believes you graduated from anything more science than an ag college.
 
LOL.
Your point is that Ivermectin is horse dewormer.

No, my point is that Trumptards are so desperate for it, that they are willing to take animal versions of it.

That shows you know absolutely nothing. But you have an agenda. Little troll living at home.

WTF is the agenda here? You think I give a flying fuck what you ingest or whether you live or die? Absolutely nobody sane gives a fuck about Covid conspiracies other than you wingnuts for whom EVERYTHING is a conspiracy to make you a victim.

Thank you for proving that you have no science knowledge whatsoever.
Now go through the Pfizer study while you are waiting for your 4th booster you dumbfuk

I talked about open access journals, I pointed out that the study was sponsored by the BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENT.

You didn't address any of those points, you are willing to swallow huge GOVERNMENT load that suits your inbred group narrative and then go back for seconds. AND THEN you complain about 'agendas'. Nobody cares whether you take vaccines or not,nobody gives a shit about you.

STFU retard.
 
Nothing works. You either survive or you don't.

We don't understand the disease, so how can we cure it? Why give out vaccines for something we have no clue about?
 
I just out of a 5 day term with covid at the hospital. Ivermectin didn't help me. Or maybe it did? How can we know?

Had "Covid Pneumonia" + "Bacteria Pneumonia", caused by covid, of course.

Docs look at 19 year olds unvaxxed dying and 90 year old vaxxed making it and think they can draw a conclusion.

I use to think it mattered what you did. It doesn't. If you have the genes you good. If not well you don't make it.
 
I just out of a 5 day term with covid at the hospital. Ivermectin didn't help me. Or maybe it did? How can we know?

Had "Covid Pneumonia" + "Bacteria Pneumonia", caused by covid, of course.

Docs look at 19 year olds unvaxxed dying and 90 year old vaxxed making it and think they can draw a conclusion.

I use to think it mattered what you did. It doesn't. If you have the genes you good. If not well you don't make it.
Welcome Back!
How soon after onset did you treat with ivermectin?
What did the remainder of your treatment consist of?
Check this out:
https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
 
Last edited:
Back
Top