Covid Vaccine Scam, Ivermectin is the cure (Compilation)

Van_der_Voort_4 said:
...legally, all these mandate threats hinged on licensure, aka "approval." No one wanted to go to court defending a mandate under EUA. And the feds probably promised all the employers, schools, states, etc. that a license would be issued before colleges and schools started.

But there is a huge elephant in the room. Under EUAs, the government pays for the product and the manufacturer has NO liability, unless you can prove willful misconduct AND the DHHS Secretary allows you to sue. That has never happened.

But once the product (Pfizer's vaccine, today) is licensed, the liability shield under EUA disappears. Unless there has a been a secret agreement regarding liability after approval, which is probably not legal, Pfizer will be liable for all injuries sustained by the licensed vacine. And Pfizer's vaccine seems to be causing a record number of injuries and deaths, based on the VAERS data.

The FDA approval letter, issued today, was unusual. It stated that current bottles of vaccine, which are not branded with the "Cominarty" brand name, are still authorized, not approved. Only newer bottles with "Cominarty" labels will be approved, licensed product.

What that means is that people cannot be mandated to receive vaccine from the old bottles. But if they do accept the non-brand vaccine, they cannot sue if injured.

If they receive the branded vaccine and are injured, they can be mandated to take it, but they can also sue the company for damages.

Here is what might be happening. FDA issued a license, so everyone thinks the mandate is now in effect. But if no "Cominarty" labelled vaccine is being administered, just the old authorized vaccine, there is no licensed product being used, and there is no actual mandate. And no ability to sue if injured.

If you have looked at any of the leaked contract documents between Pfizer and Israel or Albania, or heard about the contract signed in Brazil, you will probably agree with me that Pfizer would not be willing to accept liability for this product.

So: if it does not say "Comirnaty" it cannot be mandated. If it does say "Comirnaty," it can be mandated. But if it doesn't say "Comirnaty it is still experimental and you cannot be forced to take it, and if you do get injured, you are out of luck.

Don't sign a liability waiver for this product! Don't sign away your rights if you take it.

https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/08/are-fda-and-pfizer-biontech-scamming-us.html
More...

More anti-vax nonsense.
 
South Florida Sun-Sentinel: “Election season is far off, but Gov. Ron DeSantis has been in full-blown campaign mode, crisscrossing the state almost every day in the past week, touting monoclonal antibody treatments for people infected with COVID-19, defending his handling of the pandemic, and excoriating anyone who disagrees with his approach.”

Why isn't he promoting IVM?
 
exGOPer said:
South Florida Sun-Sentinel: “Election season is far off, but Gov. Ron DeSantis has been in full-blown campaign mode, crisscrossing the state almost every day in the past week, touting monoclonal antibody treatments for people infected with COVID-19, defending his handling of the pandemic, and excoriating anyone who disagrees with his approach.”

Why isn't he promoting IVM?
More...

Those in this thread that are shilling for Ivermectin have refused to answer those questions.

The answer may lie in the state of Mississippi (one of the poorest states in the United States of America) that has a tiny percentage of its residences using Ivermectin in ways too shocking to read about...

Mississippi Is Pleading With People To Stop Using A Livestock Drug To Treat COVID-19

August 23, 20213:54 PM ET

Ivermectin-Mississippi.png


Be careful, those promoting Ivermectin will try the "don't you want to save lives" ???

Yet, I don't think they realize that North America has its own approved antiviral therapeutic treatments for Covid.

They then tried the "I'm going to find personal dirt on you from other members that don't like your politics".

Yet, they don't realize these are members that many here refuse to share a damn thing with them about trading and members that we have called them out for the bullshit attacks in which the forum owner responded by closing their bullshit personal attack threads...threads started by people that are not Americans.

traderob-scam-poll-thread-attack-closed.png


The problem I think is that someone out there is not happy with North American approved antiviral therapeutic treatments...treatments that do not include Ivermectin and we have had some very famous politicians / celebrities / athletes all take one of those approved antiviral therapeutic treatments last year, and early this year.
  • I have seen maybe 1 - 2 U.S. politicians mention Ivermectin but they were immediately shut down by their constituents and then by the FDA because we have free approved antiviral drug treatments that these idiotic congressmen were not aware about...Congressman Ron Johnson of Wisconsin.
By the way, these approved antiviral drug treatments were not promoted last year under the Trump administration and they were viewed as something the normal American could not afford.

That all changed under the Biden administration. They are now free and being promoted...in my opinion...its pissed off some of those that didn't see their drug treatment get approval nor included as one of the recommended antiviral drug treatments.
  • In a way, the political bullshit is still here in the vaccines and antiviral therapeutic treatments.
I get it, there are 3rd World Countries or poor countries that are very vaccine-hesitant and rightful so because of their historical problems with vaccines. Thus, they're relying very heavily on cheap antiviral therapeutic drugs because countries like the United States are only freely sharing their vaccines but not their approved antiviral therapeutic drug treatments.

I have close friends and family in other countries, they wonder why BIG PHARMA does not freely share these approved antiviral therapeutic treatments for Covid. I can't answer that but a good guess is it has something to do with money / costs and authorization from their personal Doctor.

That brings me to another issue via the latter above. Ivermectin is cheap (very cheap) but it's not free whereas other North American antiviral therapeutic treatments are free which is why those that don't know the U.S. antiviral drug treatments are free (requires a prescription or doctor to administer) in contrast Ivermectin is being used like some banned narcotic by poor people.

wrbtrader
 
Last edited:
Does the FDA think these data justify the first full approval of a covid-19 vaccine?

Waning efficacy has the potential to be far more than a minor inconvenience; it can dramatically change the risk-benefit calculus. And whatever its cause—intrinsic properties of the vaccine, the circulation of new variants, some combination of the two, or something else—the bottom line is that vaccines need to be effective.

Until new clinical trials demonstrate that boosters increase efficacy above 50%, without increasing serious adverse events, it is unclear whether the 2-dose series would even meet the FDA’s approval standard at six or nine months.

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/08/2...he-first-full-approval-of-a-covid-19-vaccine/


 
Know Your Japan Ivermectin Facts

In Japan, the Kitasato Institute has been conducting a clinical trial since last September, targeting coronavirus patients with mild to moderate symptoms, with blood oxygen levels of 95 percent of more.

In the US, the National Institutes of Health warned in February that ivermectin is not approved for the treatment of any viral infection.
  • It said it was impossible to draw definitive conclusions on the clinical efficacy of the drug for COVID-19 treatment. The reasons it cited included the limited sample size of studies, the lack of clarity on the severity of COVID-19 in study participants, and other incomplete information.
  • Ivermectin's US manufacturer Merck also said in February that there was "no scientific basis" for the drug's potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19...
  • Japan's health ministry's COVID-19 treatment guidelines revised in July places ivermectin in a category of drugs whose efficacy and safety have not been established.
The guidelines refer to reports that the drug does not improve mortality, shorten hospitalization or hasten the reduction of viral loads in patients with mild symptoms.

Liver disorders are among the drug's possible side effects. The manufacturer (Merck) also said it was unclear whether the product could be safely used among elderly people or pregnant women.

Ivermectin-Japan-FactCheck.png


wrbtrader
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top