- Antibiotics pumped into Cattle, Pigs, Chickens and Turkey...adverse effects should show up within 3 years.
- Fertilizer sprayed on Crops or poured into the soil...adverse effects should show up within 3 years.
- Medical treatments put in our bodies...adverse effects should show up within 3 years.
- Creams / lotions put on our body or sprayed in our hair...adverse effects should show up within 3 years.
It's never ending don't you think ?
I'll keep repeating, when the
Benefits outweigh the Risks via whatever risk analysis you're doing...that's when you can make smart sound decisions about your health.
In contrast, those that use social media to weaponize psuedo-science that has yet to be FDA approved is a very dangerous game to be playing.
Let the real scientists do a proper clinical study and then let it get peer review...that's what the FDA has been doing for medical treatments of Covid. This is how you separate Science from Pseudo-Science.
With that said, if someone wants to use Ivermectin
prior to FDA approval...they're truly rolling the dice but they must bare 100% the consequences if it does not work out for them. This is something hospitals do not want to do, not allowed to do for unproven treatments because there's a
history of mega lawsuits against hospitals / clinics by the families of a patient that has died after they were allowed to use an unproven medical treatment within the hospital / clinical environment.
Simply, you either use it at home and find a doctor to treat you at home or you get a court order from a judge that allows your doctor to treat you at a hospital / clinic with
Ivermectin @
the latter has happen before at a hospital in the state of Illinois. A court order removes all liability from the hospital / clinic and forces the family that has a court order to bare 100% of the responsibility. As in...they can not sue the hospital / clinic if the medical treatment that's not approved does not work...the patient dies
or suffers serious neurological damage (adverse effects).
Below is the current list of Covid-19 Treatment Guidelines as of June 23rd. Some on the list are approved and others are not approved...some waiting to do clinical trials for proper peer review of the FDA.
Recommendation 18: In hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, the IDSA panel suggests
against Ivermectin outside of the context of a clinical trial. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence)
Recommendation 18 implies that if you want to use Ivermectin in a hospital / clinic in North America...you're going to need to get a court order because hospitals do not want the liability especially when they already have FDA approved treatments of Covid.
https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/covid-19-guideline-treatment-and-management/
https://www.idsociety.org/globalass...reatment/supplementary-materials.pdf#page=133
---------
There's better Covid-19 medical treatments and they're approved by the FDA. People should not be allowed to use social media to weaponize / spamming an unproven medical treatment.
Yet, they have the freedom to take whatever self-medical treatment they want in their own home...that's their choice. The people I have an issue with are those like
@carrer that goes online to call the other FDA approved medical treatments / vaccines
a scam.
Simply, if he wants to promote Ivermectin...then do it without bashing other FDA approved medical treatments that has proven themselves in proper clinical trials and proven in hospitals across North America.
Someone that promotes Ivermectin the way
@carrer is doing...its someone that behaves as if they're a shill for the drug or works / affiliated with a big pharma that produces Ivermectin.
wrbtrader
