Covid: Medical Tyranny

We're comparing COVID to Polio. Or rather, you are. If you are doing so, and admit that you shouldn't compare the flu to polio because it isn't as bad, then you are making a subjective call that COVID is as bad as polio, but the flu isn't. Prove the case to back your opinion. Right now, I think its absurd. If you show data to prove otherwise, I'm happy to listen.



Again, deaths for whom? 82.4 years and older?

84-year-old woman recalls similarities between 1949 polio epidemic and 2020 coronavirus pandemic
https://www.valleycentral.com/news/...polio-epidemic-and-2019-coronavirus-pandemic/
 
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/spain-plans-registry-those-who-refuse-covid-vaccine

Spain Plans A "Registry" For Those Who Refuse COVID Vaccine


And so, in Spain at least, government bureaucrats are fighting back, as Health Minister Salvador Illa warned the country would set up a "registry" for everybody who refuses the vaccine.

"What will be done is a registry, which will be shared with our European partners... of those people who have been offered it and have simply rejected it," he said.

"It is not a document which will be made public and it will be done with the utmost respect for data protection."


He added that the registry would not be made public, or delivered to employers, which begs the question: why else would the government keep a database of that information?
 
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/spain-plans-registry-those-who-refuse-covid-vaccine

Spain Plans A "Registry" For Those Who Refuse COVID Vaccine


And so, in Spain at least, government bureaucrats are fighting back, as Health Minister Salvador Illa warned the country would set up a "registry" for everybody who refuses the vaccine.

"What will be done is a registry, which will be shared with our European partners... of those people who have been offered it and have simply rejected it," he said.

"It is not a document which will be made public and it will be done with the utmost respect for data protection."


He added that the registry would not be made public, or delivered to employers, which begs the question: why else would the government keep a database of that information?

I don't get the not public aspect of it because what is the point of creating a registry if not a tool used to deny people travel or entry to places...
 
Back
Top