Cases are increasing day by day, this is so scary.
COVID-19
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
More than 300 children in Texas day cares have caught COVID-19, and the numbers are rising
Although COVID-19 transmission rates nationwide among children have appeared to remain relatively low, more than 300 children at Texas child care centers have tested positive, and the numbers are rising quickly.
As of Tuesday, there were 950 reported positive cases of COVID-19 — 307 children and 643 staff members — at 668 child care locations. Statewide, 12,207 licensed child care operations are open, and total reported coronavirus cases have risen from 59 cases in mid-May and 576 on June 23.
But guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that day care center providers consider a minimum of 6 feet of social distancing and dismiss students and most staff for two to five daysif they have a confirmed coronavirus case so public health authorities can assess the situation.
About 1.1 million Texas children were in state-licensed and registered home day care centers before COVID-19 struck. Several child care centers have closed during the pandemic, with others reporting a drop in the number of children attending.
A University of Vermont study has found thatchildren contract COVID-19 “far less frequently” than adults and found it less likely to be spread among children. It concluded that “transmission in schools may be less important in community transmission than initially feared.”
Although COVID-19 transmission rates nationwide among children have appeared to remain relatively low, more than 300 children at Texas child care centers have tested positive, and the numbers are rising quickly.
As of Tuesday, there were 950 reported positive cases of COVID-19 — 307 children and 643 staff members — at 668 child care locations. Statewide, 12,207 licensed child care operations are open, and total reported coronavirus cases have risen from 59 cases in mid-May and 576 on June 23.
But guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that day care center providers consider a minimum of 6 feet of social distancing and dismiss students and most staff for two to five daysif they have a confirmed coronavirus case so public health authorities can assess the situation.
About 1.1 million Texas children were in state-licensed and registered home day care centers before COVID-19 struck. Several child care centers have closed during the pandemic, with others reporting a drop in the number of children attending.
A University of Vermont study has found thatchildren contract COVID-19 “far less frequently” than adults and found it less likely to be spread among children. It concluded that “transmission in schools may be less important in community transmission than initially feared.”
300 kids caught Covid, and kids are almost never affected by it, and there are an estimated 1.1 million kids in daycare in Texas? What's that, .03% of the total population? Just out of curiosity, what was the second news story of the day?
Texas pauses reopening as hospitals inundated with 'explosion' of COVID-19 cases
Officials in Texas reported 47 more deaths and nearly 6,000 infections — a grim new daily record.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...tate-s-reopening-due-spike-new-covid-n1232118
Some excerpts below.
https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/pfizer-biontech-vaccine-data/
Pfizer-BioNTech’s Covid-19 vaccine candidate yields positive data
Pfizer and BioNTech have reported positive preliminary results from the ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial of BNT162b1, a potential Covid-19 vaccine.
In all 24 subjects who were given two 10µg and 30µg vaccinations of BNT162b1, elevation of RBD-binding IgG concentrations was found following the second injection.
The geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) in this cohort were 4,813 units/ml with 10µg and 27,872 units/ml with 30µg at day 28, seven days after immunisation.
These GMCs are said to be 8- and 46.3-times the GMC of 602 units/ml in a set of 38 sera from participants who had contracted the viral disease.
At day 21 following a single 100µg injection, the 12 subjects had an RBD-binding IgG GMC of 1,778 units/ml, which is 3-times the GMC of the convalescent serum panel.
The most common local reaction was injection site pain, which was mild to moderate, without any serious adverse events.
BioNTech CEO and co-founder Ugur Sahin said: “These preliminary data are encouraging in that they provide an initial signal that BNT162b1 targeting the RBD SARS-CoV-2 is able to produce neutralising antibody responses in humans at or above the levels observed in convalescent sera – and that it does so at relatively low dose levels.”
https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/pfizer-biontech-vaccine-data/
Pfizer-BioNTech’s Covid-19 vaccine candidate yields positive data
Pfizer and BioNTech have reported positive preliminary results from the ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial of BNT162b1, a potential Covid-19 vaccine.
In all 24 subjects who were given two 10µg and 30µg vaccinations of BNT162b1, elevation of RBD-binding IgG concentrations was found following the second injection.
The geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) in this cohort were 4,813 units/ml with 10µg and 27,872 units/ml with 30µg at day 28, seven days after immunisation.
These GMCs are said to be 8- and 46.3-times the GMC of 602 units/ml in a set of 38 sera from participants who had contracted the viral disease.
At day 21 following a single 100µg injection, the 12 subjects had an RBD-binding IgG GMC of 1,778 units/ml, which is 3-times the GMC of the convalescent serum panel.
The most common local reaction was injection site pain, which was mild to moderate, without any serious adverse events.
BioNTech CEO and co-founder Ugur Sahin said: “These preliminary data are encouraging in that they provide an initial signal that BNT162b1 targeting the RBD SARS-CoV-2 is able to produce neutralising antibody responses in humans at or above the levels observed in convalescent sera – and that it does so at relatively low dose levels.”
Drill Down To County Level And The U.S. COVID-19 Outbreak Looks Even Worse
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...nd-the-u-s-covid-19-outbreak-looks-even-worse
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...nd-the-u-s-covid-19-outbreak-looks-even-worse
Remdesivir is not the answer for therapeutic approach. Hydroxychloroquine is.
the second news story was Gramma Wilson crocheted an Afghan.
Scientists challenge official view of virus spread in open letter to WHO
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/coronavirus/2020/07/05/coronavirus-scientists-open-letter/
More than 200 scientists from around the world are challenging the official view of how the coronavirus spreads in an open letter to the World Health Organisation (WHO).
Experts warn there is growing evidence the virus can be transmitted through microscopic particles that can hang in the air for long periods and float several metres.
These droplets are of particular concern at indoor venues with poor ventilation and confined spaces such as public transport – even when people maintain a social distance.
The researchers have accused the United Nations agency of failing to issue appropriate warnings about the risk.
Currently, the WHO maintains you only have to worry about two types of transmission: inhaling respiratory droplets from an infected person in your immediate vicinity or – less common – touching a contaminated surface and then your eyes, nose or mouth.
But 239 researchers in an open letter contend that the guidance ignores growing evidence that a third pathway plays a significant role in contagion.
It’s believed this third mode of infection is behind a number of so-called “super-spreading” events including the infection of diners at a restaurant in China who sat at separate tables.
It also may explain the transmission among choir members in the US state of Washington who took precautions during a rehearsal.
Researchers say multiple studies demonstrate that particles known as aerosols – microscopic versions of standard respiratory droplets – can hang in the air for long periods and float for several metres, making poorly ventilated rooms, buses and other confined spaces dangerous even when people stay 1.8 metres from one another.
“We are 100 per cent sure about this,” said Lidia Morawska, a professor of atmospheric sciences and environmental engineering at Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane.
She makes the case in an open letter with experts from 32 countries which is set to be published next week in a scientific journal.
It comes as the WHO reported a record increase in global coronavirus cases, with the total rising by 212,326 in 24 hours.
The biggest increases were from the United States, Brazil and India.
Deaths remained steady on Saturday at about 5000 a day.
The scientific challenge raises the importance of wearing masks to help prevent the escape of exhaled aerosols as well as inhalation of the microscopic particles.
The use of masks has been another issue of contention in the pandemic, with experts offering varied advice on their effectiveness and authorities also flipping between advice.
The spread could also be reduced by improving ventilation and zapping indoor air with ultraviolet light in ceiling units.
WHO officials have acknowledged that the virus can be transmitted through aerosols but say it occurs only during medical procedures such as intubation that can spew large quantities of the microscopic particles.
Dr Benedetta Allegranzi, a top WHO expert on infection prevention and control, said in responses to questions from the Los Angeles Times that Morawska and her group presented theories based on laboratory experiments rather than evidence from the field.
“We value and respect their opinions and contributions to this debate,” Dr Allegranzi wrote in an email.
But in weekly teleconferences, a large majority of a group of more than 30 international experts advising the WHO has “not judged the existing evidence sufficiently convincing to consider airborne transmission as having an important role in COVID-19 spread”.
She added that such transmission “would have resulted in many more cases and even more rapid spread of the virus”.
Jose Jimenez, a University of Colorado chemist who signed the letter, said the idea of aerosol transmission should not frighten people.
“It’s not like the virus has changed,” he said.
“We think the virus has been transmitted this way all along, and knowing about it helps protect us.”
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/coronavirus/2020/07/05/coronavirus-scientists-open-letter/
More than 200 scientists from around the world are challenging the official view of how the coronavirus spreads in an open letter to the World Health Organisation (WHO).
Experts warn there is growing evidence the virus can be transmitted through microscopic particles that can hang in the air for long periods and float several metres.
These droplets are of particular concern at indoor venues with poor ventilation and confined spaces such as public transport – even when people maintain a social distance.
The researchers have accused the United Nations agency of failing to issue appropriate warnings about the risk.
Currently, the WHO maintains you only have to worry about two types of transmission: inhaling respiratory droplets from an infected person in your immediate vicinity or – less common – touching a contaminated surface and then your eyes, nose or mouth.
But 239 researchers in an open letter contend that the guidance ignores growing evidence that a third pathway plays a significant role in contagion.
It’s believed this third mode of infection is behind a number of so-called “super-spreading” events including the infection of diners at a restaurant in China who sat at separate tables.
It also may explain the transmission among choir members in the US state of Washington who took precautions during a rehearsal.
Researchers say multiple studies demonstrate that particles known as aerosols – microscopic versions of standard respiratory droplets – can hang in the air for long periods and float for several metres, making poorly ventilated rooms, buses and other confined spaces dangerous even when people stay 1.8 metres from one another.
“We are 100 per cent sure about this,” said Lidia Morawska, a professor of atmospheric sciences and environmental engineering at Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane.
She makes the case in an open letter with experts from 32 countries which is set to be published next week in a scientific journal.
It comes as the WHO reported a record increase in global coronavirus cases, with the total rising by 212,326 in 24 hours.
The biggest increases were from the United States, Brazil and India.
Deaths remained steady on Saturday at about 5000 a day.
The scientific challenge raises the importance of wearing masks to help prevent the escape of exhaled aerosols as well as inhalation of the microscopic particles.
The use of masks has been another issue of contention in the pandemic, with experts offering varied advice on their effectiveness and authorities also flipping between advice.
The spread could also be reduced by improving ventilation and zapping indoor air with ultraviolet light in ceiling units.
WHO officials have acknowledged that the virus can be transmitted through aerosols but say it occurs only during medical procedures such as intubation that can spew large quantities of the microscopic particles.
Dr Benedetta Allegranzi, a top WHO expert on infection prevention and control, said in responses to questions from the Los Angeles Times that Morawska and her group presented theories based on laboratory experiments rather than evidence from the field.
“We value and respect their opinions and contributions to this debate,” Dr Allegranzi wrote in an email.
But in weekly teleconferences, a large majority of a group of more than 30 international experts advising the WHO has “not judged the existing evidence sufficiently convincing to consider airborne transmission as having an important role in COVID-19 spread”.
She added that such transmission “would have resulted in many more cases and even more rapid spread of the virus”.
Jose Jimenez, a University of Colorado chemist who signed the letter, said the idea of aerosol transmission should not frighten people.
“It’s not like the virus has changed,” he said.
“We think the virus has been transmitted this way all along, and knowing about it helps protect us.”