COVID-19

[Cuddles]

CNN!? LOL

According to the website you like so much, CNN is left bias. Therefore, nothing can be believed that they publish because it is bias.

Can you please post from a source that is not bias?

I don't care about bias, I care about factual reporting

 

[WeToddDid2]

I don't care about bias, I care about factual reporting
View attachment 224076

Oh, okay.

Well, USA Today has a much higher rating than CNN, therefore, disregard CNN's bias subjective mixed factual opinion. USA Today must be correct according to your criteria because they have a rating of High wrt factual reporting.

BTW - USA Today has a higher rating than WSJ. Therefore, I win this one. Thank for playing your game.

 

[Cuddles]

Oh, okay.

Well, USA Today has a much higher rating than CNN, therefore, disregard CNN's bias subjective mixed factual opinion. USA Today must be correct according to your criteria because they have a rating of High wrt factual reporting.

BTW - USA Today has a higher rating than WSJ. Therefore, I win this one. Thank for playing your game.

And when did I say USA Today was not a legitimate source? I'll wait

 

[WeToddDid2]

And when did I say USA Today was not a legitimate source? I'll wait

So you lost the previous argument and you pose a question at an attempt of deflection. Are you a sore loser? Do you have a hard time admitting that you are wrong?

I used your own criteria.

 

[Cuddles]

So you lost the previous argument and you pose a question at an attempt of deflection. Are you a sore loser? Do you have a hard time admitting that you are wrong?

You've gone full retard....what argument? That a depleted stockpile would've been restocked by a competent president who wouldn't be putting orders in 3 months into a full blown pandemic?

 

[WeToddDid2]

WHO Faces Mounting Backlash For Covering For China

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/04/05/who_faces_mounting_backlash_for_covering_for_china_506911.html

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

WHO Faces Mounting Backlash For Covering For China

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/04/05/who_faces_mounting_backlash_for_covering_for_china_506911.html

I am so pissed at that WHO crew I am not going to even read that link. But whatever it says, I believe it even moreso, even if the word moreso is tautologically incorrect.

 

[Cuddles]

WHO Faces Mounting Backlash For Covering For China

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/04/05/who_faces_mounting_backlash_for_covering_for_china_506911.html

this thread may be of interest:
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/donald-trump-the-buck-stops-elsewhere.335800/

And that's what happens when you lose leverage to other countries willing to fund "impartial" organizations who depend on charity:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/02/1...ronavirus-state-department-usaid-budget-cuts/
Trump Seeks to Halve U.S. Funding for World Health Organization as Coronavirus Rages
The president’s new budget would cut more than $3 billion in global health programs.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Trump Seeks to Halve U.S. Funding for World Health Organization as Coronavirus Rages
The president’s new budget would cut more than $3 billion in global health programs.

Let's just say that China has been getting a good return on their contributions to the WHO.

They start a frigging pandemic that takes the entire world down, then WHO praises them and presents them as a model for epidemic management and seemingly knows nothing about their biolabs and wet markets. Yeh, and Orange Man Bad for not funding them more.

And because you lefties are in the tank for both China and the UN it creates a dilemma for you: How to stick your head up the arses of both of them at the same time.

 

[Black_Cat]