I am very impressed with your ability to research! There are scientific basis for the outcome.
Still as the good Dr Fauci said, it is anecdotal.
Well, thank you, yes, my google fu is pretty good. Not to mention I am from a country where babies get the shot and quite early scientist noticed the difference.
No, it is NOT anecdotal, click on the first link provided. Scientific paper.
Now here I am going to argue against the theory:
https://www.who.int/news-room/comme...almette-guérin-(bcg)-vaccination-and-covid-19
To refute this, this was the WHO's opinion and honestly, fuck the WHO, I don't take anything seriously what they say anymore. Second this was back in April and by now there should be a result of those 2 mentioned studies. (see the bottom of this post)
Now one thing that makes the picture more complicated is that there are different strains of BCG, IIRC the Russian (for East Europe), Chinese, Latin American,etc.
It is entirely possible that all those BCG strains are not equal and one is better at protecting than the others.
This article is only 2 weeks old and yes, it backs the theory:
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-preliminary-tuberculosis-vaccine-limiting-covid-.html
" we found that countries with high rates of BCG vaccinations had lower rates of mortality," "
Oh wait, here comes the Germany again:
"One sample that stood out was Germany, which had different vaccine plans prior to the country's unification in 1990. While West Germany provided BCG vaccines to infants from 1961 to 1998, East Germany started their BCG vaccinations a decade earlier, but stopped in 1975. This means that older Germans—the population most at risk from COVID-19—in the country's eastern states would have more protection from the current pandemic than their peers in western German states. Recent data shows this to be the case: western German states have experienced mortality rates that are 2.9 times higher than those in eastern Germany."
Last edited:

