Too much typing for all the Yahoo refugees, so I'll be succinct.
Foremost, there's always someone on the other side of every tick. My money says, for the most part, its the specialist.
I like being "the only one" on one side. Speaks volumes.
My position didn't go as planned, but it is for the specialist. Media limelight shakes out a lot. When he has enough............
Although not as planned, lowers my taxes enough when coupled with potential upside to maintain.
One good gap up and trend day could shore me up quite quickly.
I was new in 1968.
Not in love with it or anything else. I do like buying extreme weakness and adding in increments (plural) on a filtered breakout. 20 day HHV will suffice.
None of you were short at 40 where should have been.
Dubious whether you were at 30.
Regardless, max potential 100% nominal.
As for the miraculously nimble, such as Long Horns, yeah right. Don't spend it all in ONE place.
My position is no worse than it was 4 weeks ago.
Not going anywhere. Keep em' coming.
I may type. I may not.
Foremost, there's always someone on the other side of every tick. My money says, for the most part, its the specialist.
I like being "the only one" on one side. Speaks volumes.
My position didn't go as planned, but it is for the specialist. Media limelight shakes out a lot. When he has enough............
Although not as planned, lowers my taxes enough when coupled with potential upside to maintain.
One good gap up and trend day could shore me up quite quickly.
I was new in 1968.
Not in love with it or anything else. I do like buying extreme weakness and adding in increments (plural) on a filtered breakout. 20 day HHV will suffice.
None of you were short at 40 where should have been.
Dubious whether you were at 30.
Regardless, max potential 100% nominal.
As for the miraculously nimble, such as Long Horns, yeah right. Don't spend it all in ONE place.
My position is no worse than it was 4 weeks ago.
Not going anywhere. Keep em' coming.
I may type. I may not.
