Countdown to Trump's 2nd Inauguration Day

Buy1Sell2 said:
The articles that I have posted suggest that the election results should be different not that the election would be overturned. We've known for a long time that in the current state of affairs, the election would not be overturned. However, the results should have been corrected but no one in Congreff or courts would take the matter up.
More...

Exactly. The US Supreme Court should have grown a pair and took on the issue of election fraud. Instead, the lame excuse of John Roberts was that he was afraid of riots? There were numerous cases filed, with huge numbers of sworn affidavits by US citizens on what they have seen happening. In an election choosing the President of the United States, it was incumbent upon them to rule on the election fraud to make sure every valid vote is counted and the bogus, invalid votes removed from being counted. Any other country, that is not a banana republic would have done everything necessary to ensure the elections were honest.
 
smallfil said:
Exactly. The US Supreme Court should have grown a pair and took on the issue of election fraud. Instead, the lame excuse of John Roberts was that he was afraid of riots? There were numerous cases filed, with huge numbers of sworn affidavits by US citizens on what they have seen happening. In an election choosing the President of the United States, it was incumbent upon them to rule on the election fraud to make sure every valid vote is counted and the bogus, invalid votes removed from being counted. Any other country, that is not a banana republic would have done everything necessary to ensure the elections were honest.
More...

John Roberts never said or wrote anything about being afraid of riots. The reason was simply because there was no case. Courts have to work with facts, not tweets or fantasy from right wing conspiracy sites.

The source for the story you are referring to is supposed to be a SC staffer that overheard an internal discussion. Problem: the judges didn't meet for months during that time because of Covid, so the story is completely made up. And even if we leave that out: how trustworthy can an anonymous source like that be?

What if a former employee of the White House anonymously states Trump sucked Putin's d*** in the oval office? Would you believe that too? If not, please explain the difference between the two cases.
 
Atlantic said:
another trump presidency would be the end of democracy, rule of law and constitution.
More...
We can all have and exchange opinions here, and we can even have zealots on one side or the other, no biggie... but you can't really believe this right? I mean come on... that would never happen in a trillion years. For real. Destroy the Constitution, and even the most die-hard maga's would have his scalp.
 
vanzandt said:
We can all have and exchange opinions here, and we can even have zealots on one side or the other, no biggie... but you can't really believe this right? I mean come on... that would never happen in a trillion years. For real. Destroy the Constitution, and even the most die-hard maga's would have his scalp.
More...

yes i believe that he would do everything to spend the rest of his life in the white house - because the alternative would be prison for him.

hitler, putin, kim, ... are his role models - as we know.
 
vanzandt said:
We can all have and exchange opinions here, and we can even have zealots on one side or the other, no biggie... but you can't really believe this right? I mean come on... that would never happen in a trillion years. For real. Destroy the Constitution, and even the most die-hard maga's would have his scalp.
More...

If you haven't noticed -- the die-hard MAGA's are cheering Trump on to destroy the Constitution and impose a dictatorship.
 
upload_2024-1-13_10-18-15.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top