Countdown to Horowitz beginning

even if accepted as true, the article seems to be reporting on just the mifsud scenario.

just one piece of the vast puzzle that links over into the intel agencies, state department, white house etc. and over to europe, etc. if all of that has settled then Durham will be closing down shop soon, right? even though he just requested more staff and resources.

otherwise.....


More staff and resources is meaningless, it is padding the budget.

As I said you are clinging to some magic report out of thin air just like you claimed the Dems did with Mueller.

It is just money out the window.
 
More staff and resources is meaningless, it is padding the budget.

As I said you are clinging to some magic report out of thin air just like you claimed the Dems did with Mueller.

It is just money out the window.

Oh, Mueller did a lot of investigation. Not just a report. That's one of the primary reasons why Usual Tard for example says he is able to move on. Because a real investigation was done.
Unlike the Hillary situation where the problem was that a real investigation did not happen. Mueller tried to lock up everyone he could. Dems had problems with it because it was all about getting Trump and he was not able to do that.

I dont mind at all having Durham go through a phase of doing a real investigation. If he does not find anything, then we can move on then. You say he won't, but you don't know. I will wait for him to say that, not you.

Also, y'all are still working the game of watering Horowitz's upcoming report down to the point that no one should even bother to pay any attention to it. Ahhh, no. Others will be the judge of that. Usual Tard has been working overtime the last week to beat the drums about how the FBI is stellar and above reproach. I will be looking for that in the report. His first one and the second one just about Comey certainly did not say that.
 
Last edited:
OYou say he won't, but you don't know. I will wait for him to say that, not you.

A

You are claiming the findings already, you are not waiting for anything. I don't know..but I can bet plenty of money it will all be a waste just like Mueller was....well Mueller did lead to indictments of Trump cronies so something came out of it.
 
Is this the end of the Shillary Obama cabal?

https://thehill.com/policy/national...cant-provide-evidence-trump-was-set-up-by-doj
Report: Barr attorney can't provide evidence Trump was set up by DOJ

The attorney handpicked by Attorney General William Barr to investigate the origins of the probe into the Trump campaign and Russian election interference has reportedly found no evidence to support claims from conservatives that the case was a setup by U.S. intelligence officials.

Sources told The Washington Post that John Durham, the U.S. attorney chosen by Barr to lead an investigation, told the Justice Department's inspector general (IG), who conducted his own probe, that he has found no evidence to support claims that a Maltese professor who spoke with former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos was secretly a U.S. intelligence asset.

Allies of the president have claimed for months that the professor, Josef Mifsud, who spoke with Papadopoulos about the possibility of obtaining Hillary Clinton's stolen emails, was actually an asset of U.S. intelligence agencies seeking to set up the Trump campaign on criminal charges.

Sources close to the investigation added to the Post that the draft report written by IG David Horowitz is likely to detail instances of misconduct by FBI agents involved with the investigation, but to conclude that top FBI officials did not act with political bias during the 2016 election.

“His excellent work has uncovered significant information that the American people will soon be able to read for themselves,” a spokeswoman for the Justice Department told the Post of the report's upcoming release. “Rather than speculating, people should read the report for themselves next week, watch the Inspector General’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and draw their own conclusions about these important matters.”

Republicans have argued since the inception of the now-shuttered special counsel investigation into the Trump campaign that the probe was launched improperly based on unfounded accusations detailed in a dossier crafted by an ex-British intelligence agent, Christopher Steele, and used by the Obama administration to hurt President Trump's chances of being elected.

Top former officials at the FBI have roundly dismissed that claim, arguing that the investigation was conducted without political bias.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
omg. Frog’s hopes disappear like tears in rain!

9B2D822C-F4AB-4179-B31C-C978C110C184.jpeg
 
even if accepted as true, the article seems to be reporting on just the mifsud scenario.

just one piece of the vast puzzle that links over into the intel agencies, state department, white house etc. and over to europe, etc. if all of that has settled then Durham will be closing down shop soon, right? even though he just requested more staff and resources.

otherwise.....

Oy vey. You have no reason to criticize the democrats endless investigations then.
 
Oy vey. You have no reason to criticize the democrats endless investigations then.

Oh I absolutely do.

But have said repeatedly that if they want to go down that road I was more than willing to put on a counter-offensive as long and as deep as possible. This is true with regard to DOJ swamp type investigations. I object but if they want to go down that road, I am more than willing to see some lengthy investigations of them. Some of that has been done. and some more in progress. Then ditto for lengthy investigations of Trump for impeachment. I object but if you want to go down that road, well then, I am willing to take the Senate trial out to about March with as many witnesses as possible.

See how it works?

While I have you here, are we going to be seeing those pee-pee tapes when Horowitz's report comes out. Y'all will recall that Comey directly went to the White House and notified Trump about them. So, those exist right? Oh I see, Comey was just shaking Trump down to keep his job. J. Edgar Hoover style. You know that was Hoover's modus, to always let his opponents know that he had something on them. Anyway, we be seeing those tapes, right?
 
Last edited:
Oh I absolutely do.

But have said repeatedly that if they want to go down that road I was more than willing to put on a counter-offensive as long and as deep as possible. This is true with regard to DOJ swamp type investigations. I object but if they want to go down that road, I am more than willing to see some lengthy investigations of them. Some of that has been done. and some more in progress. Then ditto for lengthy investigations of Trump for impeachment. I object but if you want to go down that road, well then, I am willing to take the Senate trial out to about March with as many witnesses as possible.

See how it works?

While I have you here, are we going to be seeing those pee-pee tapes when Horowitz's report comes out. Y'all will recall that Comey directly went to the White House and notified Trump about them. So, those exist right? Oh I see, Comey was just shaking Trump down to keep his job. J. Edgar Hoover style. You know that was Hoover's modus, to always let his opponents know that he had something on them. Anyway, we be seeing those tapes, right?

So then you are in a happy place. Enjoy the endless investigations of the same allegations over and over.

Just remember einstein said insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
 
So then you are in a happy place. Enjoy the endless investigations of the same allegations over and over.

.

Oh no. I like new material.

Like hearing Joe and Hunter testify. Like seeing the transcripts of Joe's conversations with the Ukraine. Durham's report which looks beyond the doj. More texts being release.

Why would the time come when I did not want to see that? Where is the report on Rice and Clapper's involvement? Oh, I see. Horowitz doesnt have jurisdiciton there so Durham is looking at it. Fine, I thought someone just told me were looking at the same thing over and over. Guess not.
 
Back
Top