Alright well, you have studied up a bit since my post and found yourself now agreeing with what I said, but trying to crabwalk around and be right about some various points. There is a lot going on with McCabe right now, and there is a grab-bag of issues and areas of exposure that one could seize upon or focus on depending on the development of the week. I simply said that I have always said for years that McCabe will be indicted, but that my belief in that waivered for the last couple months, but that I am back to believing that again. And that his lawyers are known to be meeting with the Deputy Attorney General to try to tamp something down. That's all. Now you come along and support that view but speculate that it is upon a different set of McCabes dozens of issues. Fine, whatever, I said they were trying to tamp down "something" which takes in quite a lot, being a general term. We can agree he has many problems that the DOJ could seize upon, except on even numbered days when you tell me that I am tin foil to suggest that they are even investigating him. Whatever.
Here is what I said in part in my post. I stand by it.
=====================================================
"Just to open my kimono and create an opportunity for future ridicule I will comment on McCabe:
Regular viewers know that for years I have alleged that McCabe will eventually be indicted (not sure he can be successfully prosecuted in DC, but that is another matter). Just to be upfront, I will say that my view on that changed during the last couple months or at least it went into the "I dunno" category. But now I am back to thinking that he will be indicted. The atmospherics surrounding him are still not good, and his legal team recently met with the Deputy Attorney General. They obviously are trying to reverse something that has been decided at a lower level."
