I am curious regarding how the arrest are going to take place. Do they do a mass arrest at within a short window or do they arrest a several people a week every week until October of 2020?
Lol!!!
The arrests start in Jan 2021.
I am curious regarding how the arrest are going to take place. Do they do a mass arrest at within a short window or do they arrest a several people a week every week until October of 2020?
Yeah, there is something clearly wrong with Wray.
Yeah, there is something clearly wrong with Wray.
That is what will make it much more satisfying when they start arresting many of the dems.Lol!!!
The arrests start in Jan 2021.
That is what will make it much more satisfying when they start arresting many of the dems.
I am sure they will be treated well on Comey island.
Yeah, I am sure that Mueller will get him.It wont dems.Im sure Barr and Trump will be treated well behind bars.
Yeah, I am sure that Mueller will get him.
There is nothing in the Mueller report to charge Trump with obstruction. Not even one.While there is enough in Mueller's report for The new AG to get Trump on multiple obstruction charges,I'm hoping its the New York DA that gets him so he can do his time in Rikers with Manafort.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/06...-reflections-on-the-torture-of-paul-manafort/
Angry over the possibility that Manafort may be pardoned by President Donald Trump, the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus Vance, charged Manafort with additional crimes based on state law. That way, if found guilty of state offenses, he cannot be pardoned by Trump, as the president’s power to pardon applies only to federal—not state—crimes.
Everyone knows this prosecution is politically motivated. Vance hates the president and wants to use solitary confinement in a hellhole with violent criminals to squeeze Manafort into testifying against the president.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ala...-to-rikers-prepare-to-be-shocked-and-outraged
Perhaps that is the real reason behind the decision to transfer Manafort: the DA hopes that he might be motivated to provide evidence of state crimes for which Trump could be charged.
The law is unclear as to whether a sitting president can be indicted and /or tried for a state, as distinguished from a federal, crime. So when Vance says that no one is above the law, he may be referring to Trump rather than Manafort.
There is nothing in the Mueller report to charge Trump with obstruction. Not even one.
If that was true, he would have been impeached by Congress already. He hasn't because that is bullshit. That is a false equivalence. If he weren't president? That is pure political bullshit propaganda by liberal political pundits. It is a retarded statement. A person that is not the president does not have the same legal authority and powers as the president of the us as per the laws, legal precedent, and constitution.![]()
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1002436
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
President Donald Trump would have been indicted for obstruction of justice in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation if he did not hold the nation's highest office, nearly 700 former federal prosecutors argued in an open letter published on Medium on Monday.
The ex-prosecutors — who have served under both Republican and Democratic administrations dating back to President Dwight D. Eisenhower — said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple
felony charges for obstruction of justice.”