You make me laugh with "Checkmate for the FISA investigators". It is a known brain function to interpret the facts so that it coincides what you want them to be, and ignore any fact that contradicts your fantasy world.
Last edited:
Countdown to Horowitz beginning
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
You make me laugh with "Checkmate for the FISA investigators". It is a known brain function to interpret the facts so that it coincides what you want them to be, and ignore any fact that contradicts your fantasy world.
McCabe reveals he’s the one who decided to remove Strzok from Mueller’s team
Here is an interesting little scenario that the republicans can discuss with Mr. Mueller when the dems have him before the committee.
It is well established that Mueller hired clinton-bootlickers for his investigative team. When the stroz-page texts were revealed the whole level of bias was seen to be absurd. The lefties allowed Mueller to partially redeem himself by consistently reporting that the minute he found out he moved strzok out. TURNS OUT THAT HE DID NOT DO THAT AT ALL. IT WAS MCCABE WHO INTERVENED.
Which also raises (even more) questions about McCabe. Sure, it sounds like McCabe was doing the right thing at first thought, unless you overlook the whole reason why the independent counsel was appointed. Mueller reported to Rosenstein in the DOJ, not McCabe. The whole point of the independent counsel was to get it away from the regular line FBI management. McCabe has all sorts of reasons why he does not want anything about Strzok to blow up and be examined that have nothing to do with seeing that there is a quality independent counsel investigation. A case could be made for Rosenstein intervening and having Strzok removed because he was overseeing Mueller and had a valid reason for interjecting himself. McCabe? Not so much. He is one of the very hacks that the independent counsel arrangement was designed to fend off and keep out of the process.
Again, the dems might want to be careful about beating their chest and crowing about having mueller testify. Could easily blow up on them when the republican questioning begins.
And yes, this article is three weeks old month, but it is my first time seeing it. You know how it is, the roboposts by the lefties go out around certain topics or else I have them on ignore.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/20/mueller-investigation-mccabe-strzok-1336694
Here is an interesting little scenario that the republicans can discuss with Mr. Mueller when the dems have him before the committee.
It is well established that Mueller hired clinton-bootlickers for his investigative team. When the stroz-page texts were revealed the whole level of bias was seen to be absurd. The lefties allowed Mueller to partially redeem himself by consistently reporting that the minute he found out he moved strzok out. TURNS OUT THAT HE DID NOT DO THAT AT ALL. IT WAS MCCABE WHO INTERVENED.
Which also raises (even more) questions about McCabe. Sure, it sounds like McCabe was doing the right thing at first thought, unless you overlook the whole reason why the independent counsel was appointed. Mueller reported to Rosenstein in the DOJ, not McCabe. The whole point of the independent counsel was to get it away from the regular line FBI management. McCabe has all sorts of reasons why he does not want anything about Strzok to blow up and be examined that have nothing to do with seeing that there is a quality independent counsel investigation. A case could be made for Rosenstein intervening and having Strzok removed because he was overseeing Mueller and had a valid reason for interjecting himself. McCabe? Not so much. He is one of the very hacks that the independent counsel arrangement was designed to fend off and keep out of the process.
Again, the dems might want to be careful about beating their chest and crowing about having mueller testify. Could easily blow up on them when the republican questioning begins.
And yes, this article is three weeks old month, but it is my first time seeing it. You know how it is, the roboposts by the lefties go out around certain topics or else I have them on ignore.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/20/mueller-investigation-mccabe-strzok-1336694
Last edited:
Your projection skills are quite impressive.
Andrew McCabe: Not Illegal For Americans To Contract Out Opposition Research To Foreign Individuals
Heh, McCabe seems to making a lot of effort to get his defense out there before the Horowitz and Durham investigations and declassification of documents start picking up speed.
Do what you gotta do Andy. Oh, and in regard to whether it is legal for Americans to contract out opposition research to foreign individuals, you might want to start being prepared to answer the question of whether that is still true if the "Americans" helping to fund it are the FBI. Just givin ya a little heads up there. You can thank me later.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...position_research_to_foreign_individuals.html
Heh, McCabe seems to making a lot of effort to get his defense out there before the Horowitz and Durham investigations and declassification of documents start picking up speed.
Do what you gotta do Andy. Oh, and in regard to whether it is legal for Americans to contract out opposition research to foreign individuals, you might want to start being prepared to answer the question of whether that is still true if the "Americans" helping to fund it are the FBI. Just givin ya a little heads up there. You can thank me later.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...position_research_to_foreign_individuals.html
Interpret the facts?
The facts are the facts.
Checkmate is my opinion. I believe it should be, yes. It’s quite clear.
Like water is wet. Unless you want to debate that one, too?
Carter Page was a US asset.
And yet that wasn’t mentioned in the FISA warrant.
Fail. Fraud.
I am not 100% certain on the timing, but, it looks like you have 2.5 weeks left in you fantasy world. Try to relax and enjoy it before you are red pilled!
That would be great. He is a zero at best and part of the problem. Plus he has a funny mouth that always looks smirky and like it needs to be smacked.
Trump has Barr on his side now and he trusts him, so Barr will be able to help him pick someone better than Wray.
I am for tossing him out. Not in some stupid way that kicks him in the balls and causes a big controversy and all of that. Just move him along. Barr and Durham need someone that they work with. And even if you take all the DC scandal stuff out of the picture, I dont know what Wray brings to the party in regard to the FBI. Yeh, he has all sorts of background etc. Yeh, okay. So do lots of people. He is too flaccid for me.
I think there is or has been a move to bring in David Bowditch the Chief FBI Deputy Director for Los Angeles Office. He sort of impressed everyone with his proper handling of that muslim husband and wife terrorist shootout at the county offices there, whatever that episode is called. Can't remember. So again, I am not just saying you need to appoint a better FBI Director just for this swamp stuff but I dont think Wray has established any kind of presence or leadership on core FBI issues either. Kind of a dud.
You see his smirky mouth face here? That's what I be talkin about. I would slap that fucker for no good reason. That smirk seems to be his standard reply to everything. WTF.
