Coulter slurs John Edwards...

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Yes, if you call other ET members independent research.

You display obsessive stalking traits. It is obvious.

Of course, you could prove me wrong and just place me on ignore and show the world that you are not an obsessed stalker...

Oh, and another in a long line of posts of yours that have nothing to do with the topic of Coulter...just more evidence of stalking behavior.
More...
The World according to Z10. Well, why not? You are living on Planet Z.

Here's an example of your stalking: You create an identity on this forum in a lame and unsuccessful attempt specifically to harass someone. The notable difference is, I could care less, unlike your constant bleating.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/searc...=1666270&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Maureen Dowd also attacks dems and republicans.

However, she doesn't seem to need to use slurs the way Mann Coulter does...

Maybe that is why she got a Pulitzer Prize and Mann gets the booby prize...

Bush has no obligation to denounce Coulter beyond common sense and loyalty to the party...
More...
No, Maureen Dowd does something far worse, she makes it up as she goes along.

TAKING LIBERTIES WITH THE FACTS
Maureen Dowd not wanted here (MARC R. MASFERRER, 5/30/03, The Lufkin Daily News)

The New York Times' considerable credibility problem is now our problem, as well.

But unlike the Times, which has been engaged in a torturous exercise of naval gazing and self-flagellation, with its accustomed arrogance, since it was revealed that one of its younger reporters had committed all sorts of journalistic sins, we are doing something about it, and fast.

Until she explains to our satisfaction her own ethical transgression--an apparently deliberate distortion of a comment by President Bush--you will not find the work of Times columnist Maureen Dowd on this page. [...]

Dowd, it seems, may have taken the title of her column--"Liberties"--way too far.

Here's what Dowd wrote in the column in question:

"'Al-Qaida is on the run,' President Bush said last week. 'That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated ... they're not a problem anymore.'"

Here's what Bush actually said:

"Al-Qaida is on the run. That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated. Right now, about half of all the top al-Qaida operatives are either jailed or dead. In either case, they're not a problem anymore."

New York Daily News columnist Zev Chafets offered a perfect criticism of what Dowd did.

"The words in italics were replaced in Dowd's column by three little dots. Those dots say to the reader: Trust me, I'm abbreviating here, but what I'm leaving out doesn't change the meaning.

"But the dots did change the meaning," Chafets wrote. "In fact, they turned it upside down. Far from declaring al-Qaida 'spent,' Bush was warning the country against complacency. The only terrorists the president declared 'no longer a problem' were the ones already jailed or dead."

Dowd quietly "corrected" herself by including the full quote in a subsequent column that appeared in The Lufkin Daily News on Thursday.

That's not good enough, and until Dowd, and her newspaper, fully account for her infraction, her column will not appear on this page."
 
Again, a post that has nothing to do with the topic of this thread...

Quote from max401:

The World according to Z10. Well, why not? You are living on Planet Z.

Here's an example of your stalking: You create an identity on this forum in a lame and unsuccessful attempt specifically to harass someone. The notable difference is, I could care less, unlike your constant bleating.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/searc...=1666270&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending
More...
 
Oh yes, the maxfact quotes without a link that is opinion based, and if maxfact is asked for a link, he says "go look it up for yourself."

Been there done that with maxfacts..

Quote from max401:

No, Maureen Dowd does something far worse, she makes it up as she goes along.

TAKING LIBERTIES WITH THE FACTS
Maureen Dowd not wanted here (MARC R. MASFERRER, 5/30/03, The Lufkin Daily News)

The New York Times' considerable credibility problem is now our problem, as well.

But unlike the Times, which has been engaged in a torturous exercise of naval gazing and self-flagellation, with its accustomed arrogance, since it was revealed that one of its younger reporters had committed all sorts of journalistic sins, we are doing something about it, and fast.

Until she explains to our satisfaction her own ethical transgression--an apparently deliberate distortion of a comment by President Bush--you will not find the work of Times columnist Maureen Dowd on this page. [...]

Dowd, it seems, may have taken the title of her column--"Liberties"--way too far.

Here's what Dowd wrote in the column in question:

"'Al-Qaida is on the run,' President Bush said last week. 'That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated ... they're not a problem anymore.'"

Here's what Bush actually said:

"Al-Qaida is on the run. That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated. Right now, about half of all the top al-Qaida operatives are either jailed or dead. In either case, they're not a problem anymore."

New York Daily News columnist Zev Chafets offered a perfect criticism of what Dowd did.

"The words in italics were replaced in Dowd's column by three little dots. Those dots say to the reader: Trust me, I'm abbreviating here, but what I'm leaving out doesn't change the meaning.

"But the dots did change the meaning," Chafets wrote. "In fact, they turned it upside down. Far from declaring al-Qaida 'spent,' Bush was warning the country against complacency. The only terrorists the president declared 'no longer a problem' were the ones already jailed or dead."

Dowd quietly "corrected" herself by including the full quote in a subsequent column that appeared in The Lufkin Daily News on Thursday.

That's not good enough, and until Dowd, and her newspaper, fully account for her infraction, her column will not appear on this page."
More...
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Oh yes, the maxfact quotes without a link that is opinion based, and if maxfact is asked for a link, he says "go look it up for yourself."

Been there done that with maxfacts..
More...
Look it up????? Why are you asking for a link? Is this Dowd story some brand new information to you? No, you know all about it, in fact the story is not only four years old, it has been widely disseminated.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Again, a post that has nothing to do with the topic of this thread...
More...
Oh, I see, Z10 calls someone a stalker 30 times and that's pertinent to the discussion.
 
So from thin air you post some story but won't provide a link...

Yep, more repetitive maxfacts performances.

Quote from max401:

Look it up????? Why are you asking for a link? Is this Dowd story some brand new information to you? No, you know all about it, in fact the story is not only four years old, it has been widely disseminated.
More...
 
Yet another post that has nothing to do with the topic of the thread...

More evidence of maxfacts stalking behavior.

Quote from max401:

Oh, I see, Z10 calls someone a stalker 30 times and that's pertinent to the discussion.
More...
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

So from thin air you post some story but won't provide a link...

Yep, more repetitive maxfacts performances.
More...
Hey, Z10, on this planet, the sun is coming up tomorrow on March 8, 2007 at 6:21 AM in NYC. Since you will have a hard time putting credence in this "maxfact," here's the link:

http://www.sunrisesunset.com/

Did you know that you need oxygen to breathe? (Link provided to this "maxfact" on request.)
 
More avoidance of the simple request for a link to your quotes on Dowd.

The pattern continues, maxfacts repetitive syndrome...

Oh, and yet another post initiated by you that has nothing at all to do with the topic of the thread, further demonstrating the stalking and obsessive behavior...

Quote from max401:

Hey, Z10, on this planet, the sun is coming up tomorrow on March 8, 2007 at 6:21 AM in NYC. Since you will have a hard time putting credence in this "maxfact," here's the link:

http://www.sunrisesunset.com/

Did you know that you need oxygen to breathe? (Link provided to this "maxfact" on request.)
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top