Coulter slurs John Edwards...

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Just curious, are you saying that in defense of Coulter?

Not really...more of an indictment against republicans who try to cater to the PC crowd....Let's be realistic:

90% of fags vote Dem
95% of Blacks Vote Dem
75% of Jews vote Dem



...so what is the point? They ALWAYS vote like this.
 
So is that admiration for Coulter not "catering to the PC crowd?"

Quote from TM_Direct:

Not really...more of an indictment against republicans who try to cater to the PC crowd....Let's be realistic:

90% of fags vote Dem
95% of Blacks Vote Dem
75% of Jews vote Dem



...so what is the point? They ALWAYS vote like this.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

The repetitive max fact denial.

Oh, yes, my argument is what caused leading republicans to denounce her, major advertisers to drop her...

The repetitive max fact denial, attempts to take the focus away from Coulter, or any other leading known republican supporter and spokesman who verbally defecates in public...

Oh, and I wouldn't have you or anyone else shut up, watching the republiclones stumble all over themselves attacking a messenger is hilarious, predictable, and par for the course of ET klones...
There you go again, claiming it's about Z10 personally, as well as continue with the name calling; to wit: myself, the Republican Party, conservatives that disagree with you. Of course, your quiver is, as usual, light on ammunition that could be used for any real intellectually argumentative and honest debate. Do put up some more of your childish pictures, Z10, I find it defines you rather well.
 
I don't know why you didn't see it before.

You weren't watching FOX News 24/7 were you?

:D

Quote from Chood:

Artful, appropriate, deft. Why haven't I seen it before?
 
The repetitive max fact denial.

Come on max, let it all out. Have a good cry like a "faggot" would.

Oh wait, that was just a joke.

So solly...

Quote from max401:

There you go again, claiming it's about Z10 personally, as well as continue with the name calling; to wit: myself, the Republican Party, conservatives that disagree with you. Of course, your quiver is, as usual, light on ammunition that could be used for any real intellectually argumentative and honest debate. Do put up some more of your childish pictures, Z10, I find it defines you rather well.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

The repetitive max fact denial.

Come on max, let it all out. Have a good cry like a "faggot" would.

Oh wait, that was just a joke.

So solly...
Oh, my... I apologize, dear readers of ET, my predictive view of Z10 has turned into the proverbial self fulfilling prophecy.
 
Quote from TM_Direct:

Not really...more of an indictment against republicans who try to cater to the PC crowd....Let's be realistic:

90% of fags vote Dem
95% of Blacks Vote Dem
75% of Jews vote Dem



...so what is the point? They ALWAYS vote like this.

Exactly. Bunch of sniveling wussies trying to suck up to the mainstream media. Has Hillary ever apologized for all the crap Al Sharpton has been involved in? Not on your life. In fact, the media wouldn't dare ask her because they know she would cut them out of further access.
 
Republicans are done for 8 years anyway. They'll lose 08 by a landslide. Maybe get close in 12. The country moved left. Plus we'll be in recession and most Americans will have economic angst that built up these last few years.

Face it kiddies. W blew up the Rep party. The whole world hates the guy save for some religious clickers and other groupies nobody wants to hear from anymore.
 
Quote from drmarkan:

That is a problem Republicans have to overcome, but it is hard when you have a predominantly liberal media waiting vigilantly for any soundbyte to pounce on. Before the onset of Fox News, you had to distance yourself from any inflammatory speech made by another Republican, or else you had every single news station condemning you. Every single station. This went on for years.

Times have changed, but for the Republicans in this case, old habits die hard.

I still think Coulter should not have said it though. As ridiculous as the argument may be, it gives the media spin machine more fuel for the fire. Every headline said basically the same thing. Coulter calls Edwards a Faggot. This can't be helping Republicans.

Edwards hired two bloggers who had slandered Christians, particularly Catholics, in the most vile terms. No one in the media called him on it. O'Reilly made a stink and even then he didn't fire them.

I was a little surprised that no one objected to him hiring bloggers in the first place. How is that different from the ethical mess that the administration got in for paying certain columnists?

Anyway, the double standard here is obvious. Coulter makes a joke and every candidate and half the conservative columnists are all over her. Edwards goes out and makes a calculated decision to hire a couple of vile bloggers, and it is not news.

I doubt Ann particularly cares if she put Republican candidates in a bind. She is a political commentator and satirist, not a party hack. It's not like any of the candidates are great conservatives in the Reagan mold either. They did miss a great chance to show that they weren't weenies and couldn't be pushed around by the leftwing media. Too bad they all failed it.
 
Back
Top