Could Stu be right ?

just preserving stu's lies.

You're lying again.



You've been caught twice using a sockpuppet. That's you using a sockpuppet ..not me
Last time being thick headed enough, you forget to even change your name . Lol!. In any case, there is no handle "fraudcurrents." :D


"There is plenty of science showing life from non life."

You're lying again. Those are not the words I used . You've been caught lying that way before.

Nobody here will be surprised if someday science shows life evolved from non life.

Science already does show how that could occur. Which is what I said.




That's a theological thesis, not a scientific one.[/QUOTE]
 
"just preserving your lies Jem."

jem said:
Stu is denying he every said this on another thread.
Every few weeks he tries to pretend there is proof of life coming from non life...
 
My eyes are open, and it's plainly seen.... the odds of your so-called natural events aligning themselves to make matter out of absolute nothingness let alone life as we know it, make it totally impossible. Actually "impossible" doesn't accurately convey the true essence in this sense .....

ergo, seeing as it could not have happened by random chance the only possible and simplest explanation is - it was designed and created.


HitItWithYourBible.gif
 
I am pretty sure you must be the 3rd iteration of Stu. You have devolved into childish out of context cut and pasting.

We went from Smart stu, to fakeout stu who knew science but distorted it, to mostly weak posts stu.

thanks for pointing that out.
 
I am pretty sure you must be the 3rd iteration of Stu. You have devolved into childish out of context cut and pasting.

We went from Smart stu, to fakeout stu who knew science but distorted it, to mostly weak posts stu.

As opposed to the fourth iteration of yourself, from civil jem that soon turned into an ignorant jem, to an evading lying distorting jem, to all those except the first into the trolling jem, who can't hold a rational argument.
 
Back
Top