Could Jane Street & Millennium be fighting over Destriero's SPX Skew Lock?

You consulted with Jane street right?


I did a one on one with a guy at Jane St but not with either of the guys named. I am hesitant to work with ppl on the sell-side unless I know them personally. I'd have to look at the payment to see if it was wire or PP, etc. I remember it was the largest single fee to date.
 
I understand, but how do you prove it? Can the ideas learned or developed not be coded again? And if code was actually stolen, can it not be modified enough, in style if not in essential content, to distinguish it from the original code? At least enough for plausible deniability? Again, I'm out of my depth here, especially since I nether code nor trade options.

In practice it’s hard to prove.

like poaching former colleagues.

you have a conversation just before you leave. And then like 10 days later a headhunter calls that colleague with an amazing opportunity.
 
I did a one on one with a guy at Jane St but not with either of the guys named. I am hesitant to work with ppl on the sell-side unless I know them personally. I'd have to look at the payment to see if it was wire or PP, etc. I remember it was the largest single fee to date.


I'd like the see any discovery (broadly) as it pertains to frequency, but it will never get there.

I held back the viability/edge parm (that allows for automation) from the 1 on 1 and group work. Nobody got that.
 
This thing in the filing has to be something involving babysitting; flow-driven, high-freq, etc., i.e., MMing. Just a coincidence.
 
Back
Top