I once read an article that talked about the concept that MBA schools create conformity of thought since they tend to teach the same kinds of stuff the same way.
I was wondering how this applies to charting/technical analysis. I can see elements that may or may affect price action without picking up a book. So my question is...if I pick up a book, and really study it...stuff like head and shoulders formations, cup with a handle, etc., will that truly help me? I mean, if I look at a chart and reach the same conclusions about a stock or a market as other traders who read the same book, is that good or bad?
Can this stuff be self-taught? And would that be an advantage, or a disadvantage?
Note that I'm keenly aware that the majority of people haunting this forum are interested in the academic end of things. This is like going to a seminar for horoscopes and asking if horoscope charting is needed.
SM
I was wondering how this applies to charting/technical analysis. I can see elements that may or may affect price action without picking up a book. So my question is...if I pick up a book, and really study it...stuff like head and shoulders formations, cup with a handle, etc., will that truly help me? I mean, if I look at a chart and reach the same conclusions about a stock or a market as other traders who read the same book, is that good or bad?
Can this stuff be self-taught? And would that be an advantage, or a disadvantage?
Note that I'm keenly aware that the majority of people haunting this forum are interested in the academic end of things. This is like going to a seminar for horoscopes and asking if horoscope charting is needed.
SM