I'll take it as one anyway...It wasn't meant as one...

The best thing to do with moronic comments like yours is this...

I'll take it as one anyway...It wasn't meant as one...


Poor guy... Apparently you don't even know how to read, if you think you understood Friedman and call for government regulation, defend giving "free stuff" to others and even the US POST, which was one of the institutions he most criticized for being inefficient and wasteful...No it's actually YOU, @NeoTrader who claim that you worship Friedman but you have NO IDEA what he wrote and just keep quoting him out of context. Anyway, I am done with you. It seems that you don't understand what I wrote and choose not to. Hopefully one day you will.



Wow, guess I was pretty close with my profile. I'll add one more...you live in either your parent's basement or with your sister .I'll take it as one anyway...
The best thing to do with moronic comments like yours is this...![]()
Wow, guess I was pretty close with my profile. I'll add one more...you live in either your parent's basement or with your sister .



Yes but if everybody works together, Monero can actually be anonymous and have possibly a stable storage of value and would make it as close to a swiss bank as a crypto can be and EVERYBODY benefits.
Well, I was referring to Bitcoin in my previous post. Monero is already like that, so there is really no need for extra consensus. But bitcoin so far has failed to implement much needed improvement, thus my previous post.
So the answer to OP's question is that no Bitcoin won't become the secret Swiss account because Monero already is.
Well if bitcoin improves on its anonymity by perhaps using a different technology to record transactions, it still has a chance to be a proxy to a swiss bank account. It already has a max. cap. so it has better storage of value PROVIDED also that there is some kind of trading control i.e. group of people going into the market willing to buy/sell bitcoin to keep its value relatively constant.
Right now I find bitcoin is a bit of a sellout in that the exchanges chose to report transactions to the government. I mean it defeated the whole purpose of anonymity. Of course they did that to avoid having it banned but really they had nothing to worry about seeing the governments themselves are issuing their own cryptos left and right. LOL
It already has a max. cap. so it has better storage of value

LOL...sellout ? Do you think the exchanges "chose to " report ..to the government ? The big dog told them to.
The BTC proponents want it to be a liquid currency, accepted across all platforms, but still non traceable.
It dosen't work that way in modern commerce, crypto is an asset class as of now. Maybe it will be a viable currency at some point, but it won't really be that much different. THAT IS WHAT DEFINES A CURENCY . LIQUIDITY AND TRANSPARENCY.
And don't come back with fiat, ask all the mobsters in jail (John Gotti, etc) who thought cash/fiat was invisible.
Well, store of value comes from stability and minimal volatility, not from market cap.![]()
It already has a max. cap. so it has better storage of value PROVIDED also that there is some kind of trading control i.e. group of people going into the market willing to buy/sell bitcoin to keep its value relatively constant.