Ah. You meant Bright's structure makes no sense. I agree, that was really my whole point.Usually prop firms have better rates than retailers, better tech, and they pass through rebates. I can understand why they would up charge traders in training, but a trader who makes money has lots of options so they have an incentive to keep them.
Also, 99% payout is ridiculously high, so maybe that’s the reason for higher fees.
I traded with them years ago and their philosophy was to discourage in and out constant trading. Let alone HFT. Even though they gave you leverage and commissions were some of the lowest in the industry.
Haven't a clue what the story nowadays but it seems no one else that has posted so far does either. Yet that hasn't stop the speculation.
SunTrader, the thread you linked a few posts back has the following post in it from 2008:
Bright is a good prop firm. The only thing can improve on is the comission rate. If they could match IB's commissions for low volume traders, they'd be perfect. Also, get rid of the desk fee.
They weren't beating IB's rates back then, and they still weren't in 2014. Unfortunately I can't find the fees page on the wayback machine but I recall that even their highest tiers were worse than IB. Sorry but that is not even close to being "lowest in the industry"