costless collars

Back to Ozzy here, Ozzy it's important that you understand what you are trying to do. All the collar is is a vertical call spread. So when you are asking can I find cheap verticals for .20 or .30, sure. But that is all you are doing. Buying cheap verticals. It's a debit spread and if the vertical expires out of the money, you lose the .20 or .30. There is nothing magical or special about them or any option trade for that matter. The market is not "giving" you anything.

Got it Maverick... I see what you're saying.
 
Wait, can you explain this a bit? QE causes an upward drift, according to your explanation. What's the logic that implies that this makes calls cheaper than they would be without QE?

The part that i do understand is that QE lowers interest rates which affects the call and put premiums... however i didn't know that prices were affected that significantly as what you see on the options chain. But how is this tied to upward drift.... Tom? Help! :D:D
 
Tom,
Aside from collars, pretty much every other trades i've looked at, whether they are credits spreads, debit spreads, condors, etc... the premiums that you collect when you sell any option leg are horrific. they are too cheap... a miserable couple of tens of dollars. and it screws up the trade because you're profit is miserable. but of course what the books and articles show are much better prices on all these different strategies. when you look at the options chain though all i can say is :confused::confused::confused:. The prices suck.

Does this all have to do with QE?
 
Tom,
Aside from collars, pretty much every other trades i've looked at, whether they are credits spreads, debit spreads, condors, etc... the premiums that you collect when you sell any option leg are horrific. they are too cheap... a miserable couple of tens of dollars. and it screws up the trade because you're profit is miserable. but of course what the books and articles show are much better prices on all these different strategies. when you look at the options chain though all i can say is :confused::confused::confused:. The prices suck.

Does this all have to do with QE?
This all has to do, at least partly, with volatility being very low. Is QE is to blame for this? To some extent, probably...
 
Erm, this is interesting... So you're saying that the upward "drift" in prices, "caused" by QE, is the reason that the fwd SPX price that you used in your example is 0.48% higher that spot? Ooh-la-la...

What exactly do you mean by fwd SPX price? I think I have written it clearly.

I trade options from 2008, so far successfully so I am confident about my numbers :cool:
 
Wait, can you explain this a bit? QE causes an upward drift, according to your explanation. What's the logic that implies that this makes calls cheaper than they would be without QE?

Not caused, by increased. Read pls my prior posts. I have described my expanation clearly.
 
Tom,
Aside from collars, pretty much every other trades i've looked at, whether they are credits spreads, debit spreads, condors, etc... the premiums that you collect when you sell any option leg are horrific. they are too cheap... a miserable couple of tens of dollars. and it screws up the trade because you're profit is miserable. but of course what the books and articles show are much better prices on all these different strategies. when you look at the options chain though all i can say is :confused::confused::confused:. The prices suck.

Does this all have to do with QE?

True, market has changed a lot.
Though it is possible to find nice prices, for example ITM verticals have very nice prices compared to probabilities of market moves. Generally OTM call verticals have good prices for buying instead of selling as most of traders were used to... etc. etc.
 
What exactly do you mean by fwd SPX price? I think I have written it clearly.

I trade options from 2008, so far successfully so I am confident about my numbers :cool:
Well, best of luck to you... If I could offer you some advice, I would suggest you look into how fair value stock/index fwd prices are determined (cash-and-carry and all that jazz).
 
Well, best of luck to you... If I could offer you some advice, I would suggest you look into how fair value stock/index fwd prices are determined (cash-and-carry and all that jazz).

This is maybe how others determine fair value stock/index fwd prices. I do it my way since I have always been different in everything :D
Anyway thanks for suggestion, I appreciate every feedback, every idea.
 
Wait, can you explain this a bit? QE causes an upward drift, according to your explanation. What's the logic that implies that this makes calls cheaper than they would be without QE?

Perhaps he's saying that the upward drift that we has encouraged makes the calls cheap to him. It's his non-risk neutral valuation model.

As to why he would have different valuations for Buying vs selling a call, in don't follow.

I like how in one thread he's an arrogant jerk and in this thread comes off as ignorant.
 
Back
Top