Corona Virus Death Rate will be about .6% to .7%

[exGOPer]

Yeah, tbs. Forget about the brainwashed TDS far-lefties. Although I have many TDS friends. Sadly.
Just heard an acquaintance whom I like talking about how the 5th booster (bivalent) almost certainly reduced her Covid symptoms.
Eye fucking roll. It's painful to be friends with idiots.

“Booster shots against current SARS-CoV-2 variants can help the human immune system to fight variants that don’t exist yet,” Nature reports.

“That’s the implication of two new studies analyzing how a booster shot or breakthrough infection affects antibody-producing cells: some of these cells evolve over time to exclusively create new antibodies that target new strains, whereas others produce antibodies against both new and old strains.”



All those lefties (including Trump) following scientific journals as opposed to you who is glued to substack gonzo.

Let's guess who has better grasp on the topic.

 

[misterkel]

 

[exGOPer]

View attachment 297655

Peer reviewed journals are not run by government.

Do you guys have any clue at all how science works? Scientific method? Scientific process?

 

[misterkel]

 

[exGOPer]

View attachment 297663

Typical MAGAtard doing science with appeal to emotions, just like their proof of election fraud.

 

[exGOPer]

View attachment 297655

The CDC bowed to the Trump administration’s demands to change the editorial process of its weekly scientific journal after warnings from then health secretary Alex Azar to “get in line,” Bloomberg reports.

 

[LacesOut]

From your study

5.55 (95% CI, 3.7-7.39) events per 100,000 vaccinees after the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and 18.39 (95% CI, 9.05-27.72) events per 100,000 vaccinees after the second dose of the Moderna vaccine.

From the study I quoted earlier which you called 'lies'

Risk of myocarditis was increased in the 1 to 28 days after a first dose of ChAdOx1 (incidence rate ratio, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.09–1.62]) and a first, second, and booster dose of BNT162b2 (1.52 [95% CI, 1.24–1.85]; 1.57 [95% CI, 1.28–1.92], and 1.72 [95% CI, 1.33–2.22], respectively) but was lower than the risks after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test before or after vaccination (11.14 [95% CI, 8.64–14.36] and 5.97 [95% CI, 4.54–7.87], respectively). The risk of myocarditis was higher 1 to 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273 (11.76 [95% CI, 7.25–19.08]) and persisted after a booster dose (2.64 [95% CI, 1.25–5.58]).



Both show similar results, except one compares Covid infection to the risk of Myocarditis vs the vaccine

A comparison you have no interest in analyzing because it goes against your narrative that Covid is harmless.

Time to post your other 99 studies, let's see how different they are from the peer reviewed study you dismissed.

Key take away which you missed.
“This cohort study of 23.1 million residents across 4 Nordic countries showed higher rates of myocarditis and pericarditis within 28 days after being vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines compared with being unvaccinated. The risks of myocarditis and pericarditis were highest within the first 7 days of being vaccinated, were increased for all combinations of mRNA vaccines, and were more pronounced after the second dose.”

Who said COVID was harmless?
It’s less harmful than a flu, that’s for sure, specifically for young people.
How many fatal myocarditis episodes due to iatrogenic complications are tolerable for you to promote a leaky vaccine that creates more virulent variants?
100? 1000?
For a ‘vaccine’ that doesn’t stop transmission, as admitted by EVERYONE now.

Stay out of the science talk.
You know how to make fucking lattes.

 

[gwb-trading]

Just a reminder... if you want to have real problems with myocarditis then go get Covid while not vaccinated.

COVID-19 infection poses higher risk for myocarditis than vaccines
https://www.heart.org/en/news/2022/...ses-higher-risk-for-myocarditis-than-vaccines

The overall risk of myocarditis – inflammation of the heart muscle – is substantially higher immediately after being infected with COVID-19 than it is in the weeks following vaccination for the coronavirus, a large new study in England shows.

The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.

"We found that across this large dataset, the entire COVID-19-vaccinated population of England during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available, the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was quite small compared to the risk of myocarditis after COVID-19 infection," the study's lead author, Martina Patone, said in a news release. She is a statistician at the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences in England.

(More at above url)

 

[Covertibility]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1582129148637884416

The big money right wing groups have to be satisfied knowing they can finish wiping out Whitey when the time comes.

 

[exGOPer]

Key take away which you missed.

I didn't miss it, the other study I quoted has similar results, only difference is that it also takes into account covid infections and the rates of myocarditis is higher than the vaccinated

Who said COVID was harmless?
It’s less harmful than a flu, that’s for sure, specifically for young people. .

Show us the comparative death chart of covid vs flu, show us your data

How many fatal myocarditis episodes due to iatrogenic complications are tolerable for you to promote a leaky vaccine that creates more virulent variants?
100? 1000?.

Now you are asking hypothetical questions to make some scary point.

Post your data, how many of the myocarditis cases led to deaths?

For a ‘vaccine’ that doesn’t stop transmission, as admitted by EVERYONE now.

That's not what 'everyone' admitted, they said they didn't test for it at the time of launch because studying that would take another three months. The vaccine did stop transmission based on real world data, do you want data for it because I can post that.

Stay out of the science talk.
You know how to make fucking lattes.

Is making lattes complicated? What the fuck are you babbling about? One can't make lattes and research scientific papers?

Now post your data for all your outlandish claims.