So where have you cut and pasted this text from? First of all it immediately confuses CFR and IFR in the first paragraph.
I have provided many times the proven CFR and estimated IFR for the U.S. and the world based on proper data.
Corona Virus Death Rate will be about .6% to .7%
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
So where have you cut and pasted this text from? First of all it immediately confuses CFR and IFR in the first paragraph.
I have provided many times the proven CFR and estimated IFR for the U.S. and the world based on proper data.
You cite the WHO and then praise Taiwan. You must be bi-polar. Go get more bullshit from CNN, meanwhile I am citing academic papers. Sorry for your loss pal.
Yet --- you cannot provide a link to the academic paper you are citing.
Obviously because it is from a source which is complete bullshiat.
YAWN. Yet, you argue that masks are not effective.
Obviously you do not cite the link because the source is complete bullshiat.
The paper is from John P A Ioannidis -- whose continual COVID denial nonsense has been completely debunked.
https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf
Let's take a look at some of the other nonsense from John Ioannidis...
This is another "study" from John Ioannidis who has been pushing loads of fake nonsense regarding COVID-19. Let's see what the media and other medical specialists have to say about this latest bullshiat paper from May 13th. As noted by others -- John Ioannidis has become brazen in pushing his falsehoods.
For his Covid-19 work, the Stanford scientist John Ioannidis is being accused of the same bad science he has criticized.
https://undark.org/2020/04/24/john-ioannidis-covid-19-death-rate-critics/
Let's take a look at other right-wing anti-science propaganda pushed by John Ionnidas including his "reproducibility crisis" nonsense.
He continues to actively push fake statistics from other Stanford staff members that have been totally debunked. He refuses to testify for Democratic House but only for the Republican Senate.
Let's take a look at all of Professor John Ioannidis' support for the conservative National Association of Scholars NAS and a few of his positions in papers and media that liberals are ruining academia and science using a fake narrative of "reproducibility crisis".
As starting point review this paper by the National Association of Scholars NAS pushing the "reproducibility crisis" fallacy using many quotes and references from their star, Professor John Ioannidis.
Let's take a look at a Wired article showing that Professor John Ioannidis political clowns are pushing a false narrative....
Science's "Reproducibility Crisis" Is Being Used as Political Ammunition
A report from the National Association of Scholars takes on the reproducibility crisis in science. Not everyone views the group’s motives as pure.
https://www.wired.com/story/sciences-reproducibility-crisis-is-being-used-as-political-ammunition/
Let's take a look at Professor John Ioannidis starting and supporting the conservative war on science.
Donald Trump’s war on science and its long-lasting consequences
https://theconversation.com/debate-...ience-and-its-long-lasting-consequences-99534
----------- Extract ------
Since science’s crisis made it to the headlines thanks to a cover of The Economist in October 2013 and based on previous works John P.A. Ioannidis, it was only a matter of time before the crisis become enrolled in this long-standing fight between regulators and the regulated.
Thus, few were surprised when recently the EPA proposed new rules this April for transparency meant to fight “secret science” and simultaneously the NAS – not the National Academy of Science but the National Association of Scholars [sic] – published a report on science’s “irreproducibility”, urging remedial action including: Congress should pass an expanded Secret Science Reform Act to prevent government agencies from making regulations based on irreproducible research.
---------------------------
And of course there is the JetBlue funding of his work to state that COVID-19 is harmless...
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...avirus-wasnt-that-deadly.344869/#post-5101816
This is another "study" from John Ioannidis who has been pushing loads of fake nonsense regarding COVID-19. Let's see what the media and other medical specialists have to say about this latest bullshiat paper from May 13th. As noted by others -- John Ioannidis has become brazen in pushing his falsehoods.
For his Covid-19 work, the Stanford scientist John Ioannidis is being accused of the same bad science he has criticized.
https://undark.org/2020/04/24/john-ioannidis-covid-19-death-rate-critics/
Let's take a look at other right-wing anti-science propaganda pushed by John Ionnidas including his "reproducibility crisis" nonsense.
He continues to actively push fake statistics from other Stanford staff members that have been totally debunked. He refuses to testify for Democratic House but only for the Republican Senate.
Let's take a look at all of Professor John Ioannidis' support for the conservative National Association of Scholars NAS and a few of his positions in papers and media that liberals are ruining academia and science using a fake narrative of "reproducibility crisis".
As starting point review this paper by the National Association of Scholars NAS pushing the "reproducibility crisis" fallacy using many quotes and references from their star, Professor John Ioannidis.
Let's take a look at a Wired article showing that Professor John Ioannidis political clowns are pushing a false narrative....
Science's "Reproducibility Crisis" Is Being Used as Political Ammunition
A report from the National Association of Scholars takes on the reproducibility crisis in science. Not everyone views the group’s motives as pure.
https://www.wired.com/story/sciences-reproducibility-crisis-is-being-used-as-political-ammunition/
Let's take a look at Professor John Ioannidis starting and supporting the conservative war on science.
Donald Trump’s war on science and its long-lasting consequences
https://theconversation.com/debate-...ience-and-its-long-lasting-consequences-99534
----------- Extract ------
Since science’s crisis made it to the headlines thanks to a cover of The Economist in October 2013 and based on previous works John P.A. Ioannidis, it was only a matter of time before the crisis become enrolled in this long-standing fight between regulators and the regulated.
Thus, few were surprised when recently the EPA proposed new rules this April for transparency meant to fight “secret science” and simultaneously the NAS – not the National Academy of Science but the National Association of Scholars [sic] – published a report on science’s “irreproducibility”, urging remedial action including: Congress should pass an expanded Secret Science Reform Act to prevent government agencies from making regulations based on irreproducible research.
- Congress should require government agencies to adopt strict reproducibility standards by measures that include strengthening the Information Quality Act.
---------------------------
And of course there is the JetBlue funding of his work to state that COVID-19 is harmless...
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...avirus-wasnt-that-deadly.344869/#post-5101816
So you cant form an opinion to attack the actual work, so you attack the messenger instead.
In other words, you have nothing.
Other scientists have totally debunked his nonsense.
Stop posting crap from totally discredited sources and then refusing to provide a link to your "sources".
nothing is better than what you're peddling
WILDCHILD = ABSOLUTE FUCKING BRILLIANCE
Wildchild in March the death rate will be between .6% and .7%.
The CDC at the end September, the Covid death rate is .65%.
That finding is roughly consistent with the CDC's most recent "best estimate," based on studies of the epidemic's impact in other countries, that the overall COVID-19 infection fatality rate (IFR)—the share of Americans infected by the virus who will die as a result—is about 0.65 percent. According to Worldometer's tally, the current death toll in the United States is about 210,000. The CDC's IFR estimate therefore implies that around 32 million Americans, a bit less than 10 percent of the U.S. population, have been infected.