That article starts out better than it ends. Germany is doing well because they did well with the testing as long as they could but now that is being overwhelmed or projected to be.
All of the early testing snafus being noted and excessively discussed, I would nevertheless not be surprised to see the Americans leapfrog ahead. There is the roll out of the new test that allows for results on-site withing 45 minutes. If the reliability of that is good and we get the volume up as needed then we are cooking with gas. You know, it has only been, what, about three weeks since the only way you could do a test was to have a CDC affiliated lab do it. Then the big move was to deploy that to private labs, Labcorps, Quest, etc, and to the state labs and add drive-through to the process. Now we seeing in tests being rolled out with a 45 minute return that can be done on-site. That is all for the good and is a lot of progress for a short period of time. Unfortunately, we started from scratch and the epidemic rolls fast. But it would be good to have a test that can used remote with immediate returns and we are getting there. That of course is what Africa and South America etc will need too so that will be a big help to them. The model of having a limited number of tests that can only be done by a CDC lab only worked here for about two weeks so that model sure as hell will not work in Africa.
America= good, Canada = good, Germany = good, Japan=good, South Korea= good. Anyone who is moving the ball forward. China = well, I will get back to you later.