Corona 2020

https://www.aier.org/article/an-edu...alth-from-michael-yeadon-former-vp-of-pfizer/

o_O

From the American Institute for Economic Research article,

Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.

Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers.

Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.

Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company.

Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer
.

Why don't you contact Pfizer and ask the if Yeardon was ever their Chief Scientific Officer. He is giving himself a title he never had at the company.

or just go back through the Pfizer press releases and find us the one where Yeardon was appointed the Chief Scientific Officer.
 
Why don't you contact Pfizer and ask the if Yeardon was ever their Chief Scientific Officer. He is giving himself a title he never had at the company.

I just posted an article, you started attacking the guy as a nut case, etc. I then posted his bio, as listed from the original source, not ZH - doesn’t seem like a nut case?

I could care less, but your opinion means nothing.
 
I just posted an article, you started attacking the guy as a nut case, etc. I then posted his bio, as listed from the original source, not ZH - doesn’t seem like a nut case?

I could care less, but your opinion means nothing.

Credibility matters. Your source merely pushes nonsense on fringe sites -- he has no integrity -- even trying to "enhance" his job title.
 
Why don't you go do a Google search and see all the other websites Yeardon is pushing nonsense on.

Here’s the catch, everyone here knows what side of the fence you’re on when it comes to Covid. You adhere to the “official MSM doom & gloom narrative” Hence anything that opposes your view is automatically labeled, nutcase, misinformation, whatever.

In relation to the rapid-tests that are currently being used to identify Covid infections, I’ve heard it from two different doctors that they are 50-50. One said and I quote, “might as well flip a coin”.

Testing is way over-rated, if you’re sick or feeling off, stay at home and away from people, it’s that simple. Testing for asymptotic individuals is nothing more than a crap shoot.

So when I read an opposing article that resonates with what I’ve personally heard from people in the medical field, I have to question the validity of the current Covid narrative and wonder if the actual “truth” is somewhere in between.
 
Here’s the catch, everyone here knows what side of the fence you’re on when it comes to Covid. You adhere to the “official MSM doom & gloom narrative” Hence anything that opposes your view is automatically labeled, nutcase, misinformation, whatever.

In relation to the rapid-tests that are currently being used to identify Covid infections, I’ve heard it from two different doctors that they are 50-50. One said and I quote, “might as well flip a coin”.

Testing is way over-rated, if you’re sick or feeling off, stay at home and away from people, it’s that simple. Testing for asymptotic individuals is nothing more than a crap shoot.

So when I read an opposing article that resonates with what I’ve personally heard from people in the medical field, I have to question the validity of the current Covid narrative and wonder if the actual “truth” is somewhere in between.

And that's why people oppose deregulation and Trumpian jawboning of the FDA and CDC. You end up with shit tests
 
Back
Top