Seriously. The current sample size is WAY TOO SMALL to draw any conclusions either way.
Cornix's TA Performance
- Thread starter cornix
- Start date
Given your "supposed" longevity in financial mkts, I'm quite surprised at how ignorant you are of what constitutes an appropriate sample size. Perhaps you are more of a noob than you claim to be?
Who said anything about sample size? I applaud Corn for keeping it real, nothing about his trades.
But I do find it interesting that WHENEVER anyone sets out to objectively prove TA, the end result is ALWAYS the same......
Im sorry to say current price action has been nothing short of clean and swift for the Nasdaq but I will agree sample size remains very small.
The implication of your previous post is that he has failed and, in conjunction with the 2nd half of your post below, it's clear that you have already put a nail in his coffin before he's had an appropriate number of trades to draw real conclusions from.
What? How can you possibly calculate this without knowing anything about his risk/reward.
Cornix can still beat the 20% figure--- he must be a little below breakeven at this point. Hardly an insurmountable hole to dig out of in the next 11 months. But also a long way from what Al Brooks and his cult of true believers promote as returns to aspire to! A good lesson in market reality indeed.