Quote from cornix:
One trade today.
Wish all you people from the US a happy July 4 holiday!
No trading for me tomorrow and Thursday, will be back on Friday.
Quote from FreakofNature:
Based on past posts I honestly thought you had something but I now realize, all you had was optimism.
You got a long way to go, there is no edge in your trading, either that or you going through a horrendous low performance period, but then that would be tremendous bad luck considering you began the daytrading journal about a month ago.
Days, weeks, passing by, and we stuck at nothing.
Your risk management is there, I give you that, but the expectancy is not.
Best of luck to you, will return in the future to see if the first month was a fluke.
Again, calling it as I see it, no disrespect intended, I honestly think you are a stand up guy so wishing you well.
Quote from FreakofNature:
Based on past posts I honestly thought you had something but I now realize, all you had was optimism.
You got a long way to go, there is no edge in your trading, either that or you going through a horrendous low performance period, but then that would be tremendous bad luck considering you began the daytrading journal about a month ago.
Days, weeks, passing by, and we stuck at nothing.
Your risk management is there, I give you that, but the expectancy is not.
Best of luck to you, will return in the future to see if the first month was a fluke.
Again, calling it as I see it, no disrespect intended, I honestly think you are a stand up guy so wishing you well.
Quote from dom993:
Honestly, 17 trades in June isn't a significant sample set, no matter how good or how bad the net outcome.
I started trading CL always-in in my live account on March-19 ... on April-1, at the 17 trades mark, the system net P&L was -1,625, down -2,580 from its (early) equity peak of March-22. On April-17, right at the 50th trade mark, the system net P&L was -7,655, down -8,610 from the same P&L peak. On June 28th, the system had 193 trades total (including rollovers), its net P&L was +17,295. The overall win% on that period is 56%.
I am not saying 193 trades is significant either, but just from that experience, I am sure many would have categorically stated at the 50th trade mark that the system had a negative edge, but the next 143 trades had a much more favorable outcome - and this is automated trading, with hardly any change affecting the system performance along the way (the only change, made on June 1st, actually cost over 4,000). (all figures trading 1 contract).
At Cornix's current trading frequency, it will take about 1 year to reach 200 trades, and see a little better what his performance can be - at least, on a yearly basis.
Quote from marketsurfer:
Corn, how do you calculate a 4% return from the posted numbers? My calculations show an overall loss. Can you post the trades and calculation please.
). If you assume allocation of $2500 per contract it equals to ~4%. For more aggressive approach it's more accordingly.