Quote from Maverick74:
Look, this cool trader guy is EXACTLY why guys should not fund their own accounts until they are consistent. He tried to catch a falling knife and scaled into the ES while it fell off a cliff. If they didn't shut him down he would have kept holding. Why should this guy use his own money while he has not even perfected his trading yet. Hell this guy didn't even know how to roll his futures contracts. I'm not trying to pick on him but you would be amazed how many people fund accounts and don't even know the basics of futures 101. It makes no sense to blow through 10k or 20k of your own money when you can work on your game for a few hundred bucks. Then once you get your shit together, go fund yourself. Nobody is making anybody do anything here. It's your choice.
Quote from hitnrun:
ptp is not a true propreitary futures firm
sure there are many deals on the street in chicago or wherever
I have heard of deals with real futures props where the traders pay rock bottom rates & trade size for ticks
most of the firms you talk about are true propreitary firms right ?
we have to compare apples to apples ,
these guys offer a hybrid model at best . designed for beginners
ptp has only a small number of profitable live accounts, that has to tell us something about how the transaction costs affect the pnl
at the end of the day , how much you pay in transaction cost is going to affect your profitability
at $ 5.00 r/t that is a tough nut to overcome for new traders to have a chance to be in the green monthly
It's tough for even pro's depending on your style of trading
ptp rates are very high & is a challenge for most to overcome with giving up 40 % of profits
no wonder most don't make any money with live accounts
trading is tough enough without all the high costs involved to take a shot
this is a bad deal , for any profitable trader with skin in the game
Quote from Maverick74:
Joe, you do realize that a majority of ET'ers trading futures are paying nosebleed rates with TOS and IB right? Very few guys on here actually have accounts with Velocity or Advantage. BTW, I don't think TST is looking for scalpers. I honestly don't even know how a scalper would pass the combine based on the metrics. Furthermore, I think the way to beat the combine is to make as few trades as possible holding for bigger winners. I think cool trader was onto that before he blew out. Why would you want to try scalping against the HFT firms anyway? I can't think of a single discretionary futures trader who is a profitable scalper. I really think commissions is a moot point. You need to trade for the bigger moves. I mean that's just my opinion, but I'm pretty sure I'm right on this.
Quote from CoolTraderDude:
Quit knocking me on that... I already told everyone... I'm a high frequency equity scalper...! First time scalping futures...
Let me explain something to everyone about the Combine... In gambling there's a "POINT OF NO RETURN"... This means that you either make it or you don't. That's why you see poker players go all in without even seeing a card... Your equity gets so low that it no longer matters.
In Combine, I was going to lose anyway... Combine trading has a goal and the payout is specific... Doesn't matter if you lose by $1 or by $1000... You still lose 100%! You can lose by a little or by a lot failure is still failure so you might as well go for it. I think most of you guys don't know how gambling and statistics work.
I was in my fifth day... Finishing that day down was not an option because I would fail the Combine with 100 % certainty, if I did.
I went for it... Had the market turned I would have looked like a genius... It didn't... I blew up...! That's about it...
Quote from Maverick74:
So as a point of reference for anyone out there thinking of doing a combine, please disregard everything this guy just said. The purpose of a combine is not to PASS, it's to improve your trading. There is no "point of no return" as he puts it. This is NOT real money. Therefore you don't have to make it back. The point is build good trading habits, not swing for the fences so you can pass some arbitrary metrics. This guy is a gambler, not a trader. And his knowledge of stats is piss poor to boot. If you are playing a game with negative edge, the optimal strategy is either not to play or play once. Every further bet you make increases your negative expectancy. When you are scalping with futures and paying the spread, the more trades you make, the less the probability you have of making money. The opposite is true when you earn the spread. As a market maker, you want to make as many bets as possible knowing that over (n) number of trades your probability of winning increases.
Quote from CoolTraderDude:
The point of the Combine is to pass so you get funded... Anybody not going for the prize is wasing their time and money... If you don't get funded or make it to a roll you fail at the game and you lose your deposit.
You're playing a negative sum game as well... You're trading 10 days... You're not allowed to just make 1 bet and then hope it works out. You'll be making a minimum of 10 bets... Obviously, you didn't think things through.
Quote from Maverick74:
No, the goal is not to get funded. The goal is to become a consistently profitable trader. Getting funded is a byproduct of that. You are going about this the wrong way. What good is it if you get funded and can't trade? Have you thought that "that" through? As far as negative sum, yes you have 10 trades, so treat every day as a trade. The point is not whether or not you make 1 trade or 5k. The point is, the fewer trades you make with negative edge, the better. And certainly the more trades you make with negative only increases your chance of ruin. You are probably the reason why most guys who get lucky and pass the combine end up being sent right back down. Because they are not trying to become a consistently profitable trader, they are trying to win a stupid combine.
Quote from CoolTraderDude:
I could probably argue with you about this all day... I'll just say that negative sum, means negative sum regardless of how many trades you do once you do more than one trade. Your example with one trade/one bet only applies to 50/50 games like roulette where you're betting red or black and you don't pay commission.
Doing more trades in a day definitely increased my commissions and took that negative P/L up against me... I know that... Don't worry. But the odds and commission remain the same for every trade... You can't get around that, it just isn't possible.
Quote from Maverick74:
Of course each trade is independent. But over a large number of trades your "total probability" is getting worse. How do you think insurance companies make money or option market makers? Any one trade or policy can blow up in their face, but over a large amount of trades or polices, they are going to make money.

Quote from CoolTraderDude:
You're close... Your total loss gets worse but your probability remains the same.
A total probability example over 10 trades at pobability of 4.9/10... we figure -.1 due to commission down from 5/10 or 1/2...
4.9/10 + 4.9/10 + 4.9/10 ... etc... = 49/100 = 4.9/10