Quote from CoolTraderDude:
Look to be honest... No... I'm not trying to pass it... But I'm trading as best I can these days. I don't think that I could pass it even if I brought my best game and had my best days... I think my trading days are behind me. I don't trade much anymore and I have a night job these days. In fact, I haven't traded much in the last two years. Michael has been very honest and straightforward and TST has put t
hemselves on the line here. Let's give them credit for that. There's nothing wrong with them as they are.
If I had a suggestion it would be...
SUGGESTION FOR TST:
Would a Combine on a 1 month time limit be better...? Instead of 10 trading days... 1 month... trading whenever you feel like it...?
Quote from volente_00:
Since you say it so easy, do the combine like CTD and prove me wrong
You just stated above that the success rate of being profitable is 3 to 5% yet you say it's way higher to at least end the combine profitable. What the hell are you saying ?????
![]()
Quote from chicagodon:
I asked this in another post, but thought I'd ask it here. I'm tempted to throw my hat into the ring on one of these, but want to know this first.
What are the issues with trading for TST (once you complete the combine), while being registered and trading at a CBSX firm that trades equities?
Quote from nazzdack:
1) ?.....the "trader" got off to a poor start, was probably under duress, and then had his best day......on his LAST DAY. :eek:
2) I wonder what time it was on the last day when he offset his last open position to satisfy the profit objective? Was it early in the day or near the close?![]()
3) Again, I hope the guy can start earning some "real money" but it seems he "barely crossed the finish line" with "nothing left in the tank".![]()
![]()
1) 1, 2, 4 & 5 should already be incorporated into one's trading method. They shouldn't be thought of as additional guidelines.Quote from ScalperJoe:
----trading in the combine allows for more leeway than trading in a live account.
----For example.....
----1. NEVER......
----2. ONLY....
----3. I will stop trading....
----4. I will never....
----5. When my trade goes....
----additional metrics will defintely add to a trader's discipline....
if funded it protects the backer,it also increases the chance of the combine player failing,ka ching,it's not trading ,its slaveryQuote from ScalperJoe:
What isn't known is the amount of intraday swing of P&L within that last day, and if they added to a losing position to meet the profit objective.
However, trading in the combine allows for more leeway than trading in a live account.
For example, the trading plan (which a live trader must follow until they build the 5k cushion), does not have any profit objective, but it DOES call for additional metrics (30k/50k accounts):
1. NEVER add to a losing position
2. ONLY add to a position if my Net P&L is GREATER than $500
3. I will stop trading if my Net P&L is greater than $500 or my net P&L has pulled back ___% off my high watermark (Realized net P&L high of the day). Pullback should NOT be greater than 50%.
4. I will never enter a trade without having a stop in place
5. When my trade goes in the money by ___ ticks, I will slide my stop to breakeven at the least
Now, go over the funded reports again, and pretend if this trader was live and had to follow ALL of the above rules, would they have passed the combine?
I'll bet the answer is 'NO'.
These additional metrics will defintely add to a trader's discipline, but makes it more challenging to make some "real money."
Quote from ScalperJoe:
3. I will stop trading if my Net P&L is greater than $500 or $1000 AND my net P&L has pulled back ___% off my high watermark (Realized net P&L high of the day). Pullback should NOT be greater than 50%.
Quote from nazzdack:
1) 1, 2, 4 & 5 should already be incorporated into one's trading method. They shouldn't be thought of as additional guidelines.
2) I don't agree with 3. I'm not sure if I fully understand the first part of it.![]()
