Quote from rocky_raccoon:
Wow, so much fighting going on here. Take it easy, guys. Let's get back to the technicals.
Adjustments - I have a rule of never averaging down or hedging a losing trade. If it's losing more than a certain amount - close it. There will be time for another trade.
A winning position is a different matter. There may be a reason for subsequent trades. In calendar's case it would be rolling a short leg for another month if there is more than one month between short and long leg.
Another adjustment that I like is taking profit on a wining position and opening a similar one later.
"Calendars are extremely difficult, complex, risky, etc." - I don't get this. What's so complex about a bell-shaped P/L graph that goes to a tent-shaped as the time goes by? It is long theta & vega while short gamma. Delta could be neutral but a little negative bias would work better. If the position is opened when IV is low then vega most likely works in our favor. The primary risk is short gamma and that is the part I am trying to assess to size the position appropriately.
My main question essentially is:
Do calendars have a statistical edge (probability of win * size of win > probability of loss * size of loss)? under the right conditions? Low IV is one of them but what else?