convexx's "hitting bids and lifting offers" ETF options

[convexx]

that is not the issue, the issue is with someone who creates one after another show-off blog with titles like "stfu...bla" and boasts blotters and screenshots of cumulative pnl and that in my book includes showing prices, traded at, including legs, if the traded asset is a structure.

Your statement that you put me on ignore proves that you're a fraud.

I have never in my life looked at my individual fills on a complex order.

 

[marketsurfer]

that is not the issue, the issue is with someone who creates one after another show-off blog with titles like "stfu...bla" and boasts blotters and screenshots of cumulative pnl and that in my book includes showing prices, traded at, including legs, if the traded asset is a structure.

I was asked the same question by an allocator--- It is legit regardless of how the guy tries to obfuscate with unusual language patterns. -- now, wait for the personal attacks and wagers.

 

[convexx]

that I removed you from my ignore makes me in any way less credible? And I simply asked where yur cumulative pnl is that you boasted you would show each time you close a trade. Maybe you mistyped? In that case I apologize of course.


convexx said:
I posted trades in RT on my stfu journal. I posted screenshots of fairval (mid) as it's a single figure and convenient. In products like GOOG it was achievable. In index products I paid $0.30 over mid on average.

I will again be completely transparent with my timing in my ETF signals taken in vola. I will post all trades in RT. All trades will be expressed as "worst-case" fills. Lifting offers on the buy, hitting bids on the sell. Screenshots in RT that will reflect the COB NBBO.

I will be starting on Monday. I will report cumulative performance at the close of each trade. No fills inside NBBO.

30-60 day journal.

Credible? You took me off ignore as soon as I went on? http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...-php-api-interface.285837/page-3#post-4015004

 

[convexx]

I was asked the same question by a large allocator--- It is legit regardless of how the guy tries to ob

lol no it's not legit, Mr. allocution.

Nobody would give a shit where the individuals filled if you buy a vert at 700 and sold at 1000. The legs sum to the COB NBBO. Meathead, are you implying that the COB can't perform arithmetic?

 

[convexx]

that is not the issue, the issue is with someone who creates one after another show-off blog with titles like "stfu...bla" and boasts blotters and screenshots of cumulative pnl and that in my book includes showing prices, traded at, including legs, if the traded asset is a structure.

See, the net and especially this site is littered with people who try to pull down the Timothy Sykes, pulling the wool over peoples' eyes by posting aggregate prices that may or may not actually be near any executable levels. I am not accusing convexx of that, I want to make this crystal clear. But it is easy to misrepresent numbers if individual legs' prices cannot even be reconciled in retrospect.

Reconciled?! Are you suggesting that the NBBO is not summed?

 

[volpunter]

lol, no I suggest showing prices of a structure where nobody can verify those are indeed COB prices other than trusting what you state is correct is hard to reconcile (but maybe you can point to how one would retrieve the price of any of your structures at the time you claimed an execution a month down the road?). You also claimed single futures price fills (as hedge) without even showing the filled price level. And you claimed you would show cumulative pnl after each closed trade and also have not done so. Need I say more?

Reconciled?! Are you suggesting that the NBBO is not summed?

lol no it's not legit, Mr. allocution.

Nobody would give a shit where the individuals filled if you buy a vert at 700 and sold at 1000. The legs sum to the COB NBBO. Meathead, are you implying that the COB can't perform arithmetic?

 

[convexx]

that is not the issue, the issue is with someone who creates one after another show-off blog with titles like "stfu...bla" and boasts blotters and screenshots of cumulative pnl and that in my book includes showing prices, traded at, including legs, if the traded asset is a structure.

See, the net and especially this site is littered with people who try to pull down the Timothy Sykes, pulling the wool over peoples' eyes by posting aggregate prices that may or may not actually be near any executable levels. I am not accusing convexx of that, I want to make this crystal clear. But it is easy to misrepresent numbers if individual legs' prices cannot even be reconciled in retrospect. There are too many dummies who believe whatever is fed to them. I have seen screenshots within journals here of IB's TWS where the respective OP manually "adjusted" the current "position unit value" to make his performance look way better than it actually was. The funny thing was such valuation was not reconcilable at indicated time of execution. Not showing the prices of legs of a structure makes it almost impossible to verify prices unless one reconstitutes the whole structure.

Read the entire journal. I started this thread to prove I could lift offers and still maintain PNL to some extent. I did 100% on debit by lifting offers and hitting bids by the first accounting.

I received a joint SEC and Nevada reg visit due to a complaint. It's posted here. I don't trade listed, professionally. I stopped posting actual (family/personal) fills due to the regulatory visit. I provided the SEC with proof of my employment, NDA, etc.

I take 7% off the notional on entry and exit.

 

[volpunter]

dude, you are diverging AS USUAL. Nobody gives a fuck whether the SEC or Sigfried & Roy visited you. Ha, so you cannot show fills for your personal account? You can show fill of a structure but not of the leg because you received a complaint? You are full of shix!!!

Read the entire journal. I started this thread to prove I could lift offers and still maintain PNL to some extent. I did 100% on debit by lifting offers and hitting bids by the first accounting.

I received a joint SEC and Nevada reg visit due to a complaint. It's posted here. I don't trade listed, professionally. I stopped posting actual (family/personal) fills due to the regulatory visit. I provided the SEC with proof of my employment, NDA, etc.

I take 7% off the notional on entry and exit.

 

[convexx]

lol, no I suggest showing prices of a structure where nobody can verify those are indeed COB prices other than trusting what you state is correct is hard to reconcile (but maybe you can point to how one would retrieve the price of any of your structures at the time you claimed an execution a month down the road?). You also claimed single futures price fills (as hedge) without even showing the filled price level. And you claimed you would show cumulative pnl after each closed trade and also have not done so. Need I say more?

A month down the road? lol FU.

ANYONE can quote the NBBO mid from IB or TOS, et al, at the time I post the screenshot.

 

[convexx]

dude, you are diverging AS USUAL. Nobody gives a fuck whether the SEC or Sigfried & Roy visited you. Ha, so you cannot show fills for your personal account? You can show fill of a structure but not of the leg because you received a complaint? You are full of shix!!!

Here's the proof: http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...ffers-etf-options.286486/page-14#post-4030869

I have shown fills of the legs...wtf would I do so? Does it not sum? Attached is my only listed fill from this morning. There are the legs. Add them up if you can.