https://www.dropbox.com/s/sv4zdnblj8kcmq7/2014-09-19_1024.png?dl=0
Long NQ as hedge from 81.00 (one lot per 100K notional). Remain long Q-hedge.
Long NQ as hedge from 81.00 (one lot per 100K notional). Remain long Q-hedge.
convexx's "hitting bids and lifting offers" ETF options
- Thread starter convexx
- Start date
- Status
Forward look: I will be out at 82.00 on a touch and remain long the Q-hedge. 92-bid last on NQ Dec.
I hear ya, bro.
Yeah, right. That'll be testing the limits of your discipline.
Thanks for posting. Fascinating stuff.
+0.83 net on the 28/31 put spread (from 2.13 spread debit).
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xsh7umxzllo86sr/2014-09-22_0607.png?dl=0
0.86 lost on 28P.
Net-net a scratch on VXX ($10 loss at 3-lot per $100K, 5%).
Last edited:
Long NQ hedge at 80.50. One lot per $100K
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w6sxeofy4dvdv8n/2014-09-22_0619.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w6sxeofy4dvdv8n/2014-09-22_0619.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f80m70lj8ozjqtz/2014-09-22_0731.png?dl=0
Out NQ hedge 58.00 (-23, +10, net (13)) -13 on all NQ hedge. ($260) per $100K.
Out Q-hedge (4.32)
No index hedges.
Out NQ hedge 58.00 (-23, +10, net (13)) -13 on all NQ hedge. ($260) per $100K.
Out Q-hedge (4.32)
No index hedges.
I'll comment here because the thread is closed to new replies. The Patrick Agate email is meaningless. It's not "verification" of anything.
I never stated that the $486K debit was the spread notional. It's a debit. There is no reference transaction on the transfer. I posted one of two accounts traded in a PM job I held in 2004 with a transfer. There is no "verification" that the $486K means anything other than a debit from the account. In no way, shape or form does that prove anything other than some money was moved from the account.
Here's an $876 debit related to a transfer, w/destination: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5tc2r8ahxhwrrp0/1Y9Gg0n (1).png?dl=0
What was the original (2006) funding of the account? $486K? $800K? $2,000,000?
There is no proof of anything other than $486K was removed from the account. He is now posting that he has, "third-party" verification. God help him if he's stating so based-upon the Pat Agate email.
I never stated that the $486K debit was the spread notional. It's a debit. There is no reference transaction on the transfer. I posted one of two accounts traded in a PM job I held in 2004 with a transfer. There is no "verification" that the $486K means anything other than a debit from the account. In no way, shape or form does that prove anything other than some money was moved from the account.
Here's an $876 debit related to a transfer, w/destination: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5tc2r8ahxhwrrp0/1Y9Gg0n (1).png?dl=0
What was the original (2006) funding of the account? $486K? $800K? $2,000,000?
There is no proof of anything other than $486K was removed from the account. He is now posting that he has, "third-party" verification. God help him if he's stating so based-upon the Pat Agate email.
Last edited:
- Status