convexx, the same guy who just closed down his thread "convexx's "hitting bids and lifting offers" ETF options" after he could not produce cumulative pnl figures he boasted about, after not being able to coherently demonstrate fill prices he posted? The same guy who limits views to his profile? Sounds more like a guy who tries to kill others with the first shot and then vanishes rather than standing up like the superstar trader he claims to be. But then this site is filled to about 90% by want-to-get-rich wannabees who lay their hope on anyone that claims to be making money. (Convexx, by the way, your marital infidelity has been witnessed in Florida not San Francisco as you claim, and an individual called Matt that you claim is your coworker has been pulled out of your own pockets. I never got this information from anyone called Matt).
You are a disingenuous character who proceeds like this: a) putting up bold claims, b) fails to deliver on said claims, c) calls those who hold him up to his own claims as idiots, d) starts researching past posts of those who hold him accountable and starts throwing with mud, e) if he cannot pull out anything of value, starts making up stories and twisting the truth, f) if that also does not work then he concludes "you told me you would ignore me but now you read my posts, ergo you are not a credible person, g) if that still does not work he tries to find whether that user used a different nick in the past, as if that proved or demonstrated anything.
Lol, too bad for you that despite the stunts you are pulling that you do not seem to pull down the same figures as Timothy Sykes. Your ridiculous approach to pull wool over others' eyes is identical yet it does not seem to work too well. But hey, you gotta try, I understand that. Keep on positing your blotters and unproven trading results to beginners, not sure what you try to get out of it, I simply post this to warn others to not take every last little word of yours for granted.
You are a disingenuous character who proceeds like this: a) putting up bold claims, b) fails to deliver on said claims, c) calls those who hold him up to his own claims as idiots, d) starts researching past posts of those who hold him accountable and starts throwing with mud, e) if he cannot pull out anything of value, starts making up stories and twisting the truth, f) if that also does not work then he concludes "you told me you would ignore me but now you read my posts, ergo you are not a credible person, g) if that still does not work he tries to find whether that user used a different nick in the past, as if that proved or demonstrated anything.
Lol, too bad for you that despite the stunts you are pulling that you do not seem to pull down the same figures as Timothy Sykes. Your ridiculous approach to pull wool over others' eyes is identical yet it does not seem to work too well. But hey, you gotta try, I understand that. Keep on positing your blotters and unproven trading results to beginners, not sure what you try to get out of it, I simply post this to warn others to not take every last little word of yours for granted.
