Quote from Samson77:
I ask you this .... where are the Buffets and the Soro's in the Daytrading community?
Surely there would be one and surely the media would have found them and surely they would be famous I mean Buffet and Soro's lose nothing by fame and who would refuse it?
I mean come on the facts are here. Consistent Long term (7 year) plus Daytraders are an Urban Myth almost all of them find other sources of revenue when the ultimately burn out!
There is a very simple reason that the daytrading community does not have any "Buffets and Soros's." Daytrading, by definition, is very active trading. I'm not as active as many daytraders, yet I typically have 'portfolio turnover' over 500+% per day. Now, let's look at someone like Buffet or Soros... With assets under management of $50B+, there is simply no possible way that they can efficiently trade $250B+ worth of transactions daily.
Daytrading is a business where you try to capture small inefficiencies in the market. I believe that there are a large number of successful daytraders with accounts of $50k-$250k. It becomes a little more difficult (especially if not automated) to actively daytrade accounts of $250k to a couple of million. Beyond a few million, it is very very difficult to efficiently put all of that capital to work effectively. => I have tried, while managing a fund fund. Now I prefer to just trade for my own account.
I'm not saying that it can't be done, but it is much more difficult. Larger levels of capital typically require longer holding times for investment, which remove you from the 'daytrading' class. But, at the same time, longer holding times also typically mean less potential returns for the most successful of traders in that time frame. In other words, there will be a much higher percentage of daytraders with +100% annual returns, than there will be buy-and-hold investors with +100% annual returns. (more daytraders will blow up, as well)
Anyway, this is why you will not find any daytraders managing $1B+ in the U.S. stock market.
-Eric