Quote from nukethewhales31:
hey,
I deal with a multitude of funds in my business and see these pitches everyday.. I dont want to shoot down your ideas of opening a fund.. so dont think that I am. but here are some of the main problems I see with the idea of you being funded by more than friends and family..
generally you do not want friends and family to be vested in your fund.. especially as an newly formed fund with limited track record..
from the pitch on here you said.. nothing more than 10% in one vehicle .. generally max interest in one vehicle would be less than .3% of the entire portfolio.. and would be globally diversified not using an global etfs or emerging market etfs or passive indexing but actual diversification into global markets.. if you dont have a clearing firm lined up where you can buy off TSX/ASX/DAX/ etc... then you are at a disadvantage.. from calculating a lower cost basis than what aapl is at now @ 20 share the portfolio is heavily weighted into aapl at near 1%.
its also best to leave the more risk enhancing and hedging strategies alone while establishing the portfolio and investors as you dont want to show signs of nonproper hedging and excessive risk taking.
also the fund needs to grow in relation to the cash/equity fluctuation as a pair.. for example it look likes some funds are increasing wealth when they are not or if they are its extremely small..
to handle a load like this you need a team of trained traders..
I have to fully agree with âTrader KGBâ .3% is really over diversification/conservative, I would much rather agree with a rule of like 1% and when there is a special opportunity go as high as 5%. Having said that I my comfort level is really with ETFâs not individual stocks. ETFâs of giving me the privilege of continually purchasing shares and not being afraid that it will eventually go to 0. (yes, I do have access to foreign exchanges but rarly using them)
I would love to hear from other member on the form if they are using the .3% rule or 1 to 5%.
Thanks