Conservatives' Media - A perpetual dishonesty machine

[Hello]

Quote from hermit:

50-100 trillion?

Remind me again, which one was paid for - Medicare Part D or Health Care Reform.

Neither, Obama made it look like healthcare was paid for by starting the taxes before the program started, so if we are to believe that a government program actually follows its budget which is highly suspect, as no government program ever seems to be able to follow a budget, the program will still cause deficits 10 years from now.

 

[hermit]

Quote from Hello:

Neither, Obama made it look like healthcare was paid for by starting the taxes before the program started, so if we are to believe that a government program actually follows its budget which is highly suspect, as no government program ever seems to be able to follow a budget, the program will still cause deficits 10 years from now.

What do you mean neither. This is terribly disingenuous.

Even with the extra 15 billion a year, CBO says its still paid for and reduces deficit. The Bush's plan didnt even attempt to remotely pay for it.

 

[hermit]

Fox News' latest election "controversy" falls apart


Fox News baselessly suggested that Democrats would attempt to "skew" the fall elections by exempting "battleground" states from a requirement that they ship ballots to overseas military personnel at least 45 days before the election. This manufactured controversy has completely fallen apart: The only "battleground" state (as defined by Fox News) that received an exemption has a Republican official overseeing its elections. Moreover, the waiver process is part of the law and was mentioned during the debate over the legislation, which was co-sponsored by 26 Senate Republicans.

http://mediamatters.org/research/201008300069

 

[bugscoe]

Obama and Gibbs, a perpetual dishonesty machine:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=205930

 

[hermit]

Quote from bugscoe:

Obama and Gibbs, a perpetual dishonesty machine:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=205930

Err, you mean Gibbs - because that's what your link refers to.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from hermit:

Err, you mean Gibbs - because that's what your link refers to.

Who does Gibbs speak for?

Has the person he speaks for offered a correction to Gibbs comment?

Until that happens, Obama is a liar.

 

[hermit]

Quote from bugscoe:

Who does Gibbs speak for?

Has the person he speaks for offered a correction to Gibbs comment?

Until that happens, Obama is a liar.

So if Obama doesn't offer correction for what someone else said, Obama is a liar - that's some great logic.

Meanwhile

Center for Public Integrity created a scathing database listing all the times a bush officer made false statements about the threat from Iraq in the two years following 9/11. There were 945 entries that clearly precipitated into the international media and vernacular. Whitehouse pinup girl Dana Perino showed her "blonde-ness" in her trite dismissal of this vast and damning evidence.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cdDGsTEDTD0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cdDGsTEDTD0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from hermit:

So if Obama doesn't offer correction for what someone else said, Obama is a liar - that's some great logic.

Meanwhile

Center for Public Integrity created a scathing database listing all the times a bush officer made false statements about the threat from Iraq in the two years following 9/11. There were 945 entries that clearly precipitated into the international media and vernacular. Whitehouse pinup girl Dana Perino showed her "blonde-ness" in her trite dismissal of this vast and damning evidence.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cdDGsTEDTD0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cdDGsTEDTD0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

So you agree then?

 

[hermit]

Quote from bugscoe:

So you agree then?

Wow, you are dense

 

[Tsing Tao]

the article appears to be written by someone who is obsessed with glenn beck. see all the other articles with glenn beck in the headline.

i wonder if glenn has ever heard of this irrelevant author.