Conservative lie about 'voter fraud' and 'illegals voting'

Denying reality. This is a classic case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. You are a proven liar and hypocrite. You lose again TARD.

You were too impressed with your mental midgetary on the other thread that you copy pasted it here again?
 
For all my conservative friends on this board , who love our constitution so much. Where does it say that voter ID is required?

Btw, I am all for voter ID as long as any bill associated with obtaining it is getting paid for by federal/state government. If it takes 5 trips and costs someone 1K than they need to be reimbursed. Com on, we all know the reality is that voter ID laws are to suppress voting.

If anyone lives on California, can you please explain how you vote and register. For example, in New York, it is virtually impossible for anyone to vote illegally.

You are wrong about voter ID. The constitution gives congress and the president the authority to make laws. Voter ID is good public policy supported by the overwhelming majority of the public. How much did it cost you to get your ID? It is probably more expensive than most states. Did it take five trips and $1,000? I doubt it. Why would you bring up such a ridiculous example? It is very easy for almost everyone to get an ID if they are eligible.

BTW, I live in California. When I go to vote, I walk up to a poll worker, and tell them my name. Then, they check off my name and give me a ballot. The voter book is open and easy to see names listed in alphabetical order. I could read any name that hasn't voted and get their ballot. Instead of providing my name, I could provide another name on the list. If that person doesn't vote, no one will know I voted for them. I could then come back later and vote using my name.
 
Last edited:
You are wrong about voter ID. The constitution gives congress and the president the authority to make laws. Voter ID is good public policy supported by the overwhelming majority of the public. How much did it cost you to get your ID? It is probably more expensive than most states. Did it take five trips and $1,000? I doubt it. Why would you bring up such a ridiculous example? It is very easy for almost everyone to get an ID if they are eligible.

How is it a good policy if it prevents millions of people from voting?

How is it good policy when Cons INTENTIONALLY make it difficult to get IDs?

How is it good policy when the actual instances of in person voting fraud is infinitesimally small?

Policy is based on evidence, birthers crying about illegals voting isn't evidence like most of your made up Con BS.

"
A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.

In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting project "News21" sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.

Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters."
 
How is it a good policy if it prevents millions of people from voting?

How is it good policy when Cons INTENTIONALLY make it difficult to get IDs?

How is it good policy when the actual instances of in person voting fraud is infinitesimally small?

Policy is based on evidence, birthers crying about illegals voting isn't evidence like most of your made up Con BS.

"
A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.

In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting project "News21" sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.

Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters."
It doesn't prevent millions of people from voting. Denying reality. This is a classic case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. You are a proven liar and hypocrite.
 
It doesn't prevent millions of people from voting. Denying reality. This is a classic case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. You are a proven liar and hypocrite.

Sure Con, a Trump washer denying facts as usual

UW Study: Up To 23,000 Didn't Vote Because Of Voter ID Law
https://www.wpr.org/uw-study-23-000-didnt-vote-because-voter-id-law

And that was just one state during one election cycle

Here is more evidence

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-we-did-the-research/?utm_term=.021fb038c749
 
You are wrong about voter ID. The constitution gives congress and the president the authority to make laws. Voter ID is good public policy supported by the overwhelming majority of the public. How much did it cost you to get your ID? It is probably more expensive than most states. Did it take five trips and $1,000? I doubt it. Why would you bring up such a ridiculous example? It is very easy for almost everyone to get an ID if they are eligible.

BTW, I live in California. When I go to vote, I walk up to a poll worker, and tell them my name. Then, they check off my name and give me a ballot. The voter book is open and easy to see names listed in alphabetical order. I could read any name that hasn't voted and get their ballot. Instead of providing my name, I could provide another name on the list. If that person doesn't vote, no one will know I voted for them. I could then come back later and vote using my name.

In NY takes 1 trip and free, in red states check out the reality. For example, 1 office covering god knows how many miles and open at odd hours. No issue with ID as long as it it free and readily accessible, until then hell no.

in NY, we also are required to sign next to the name, forging signature on the spot is no easy task. And if people were reading others names, then when the legitimate voter would come in, it would national headlines if it was wide spread. Your logic makes no sense. However, if you are not a citizen and can get your name on the list, now it is a different story.
 
In NY takes 1 trip and free, in red states check out the reality. For example, 1 office covering god knows how many miles and open at odd hours. No issue with ID as long as it it free and readily accessible, until then hell no.

in NY, we also are required to sign next to the name, forging signature on the spot is no easy task. And if people were reading others names, then when the legitimate voter would come in, it would national headlines if it was wide spread. Your logic makes no sense. However, if you are not a citizen and can get your name on the list, now it is a different story.
NY IDs and driver's licenses are free?

http://www.nyc.gov/html/id/html/how/state_id.shtml

https://dmv.ny.gov/driver-license/driver-license-renewal-fees

I have gotten driver's licenses in three states. It was very easy. One trip, got the license immediately, except for California. They mailed you your picture ID, which took several weeks.

Your description of how it's done in red states is bullshit. What state has that procedure?

I told you how I voted in California. I have voted this way in three different counties. I may have had to sign my name, but I don't think so. No one would check unless two people tried to vote with the same name. Then, the second person trying to vote would fill out a provisional ballot, and an investigation might ensue.
 
Last edited:
Judge Tosses NAACP Lawsuit Challenging Alabama’s Voter ID Law
'It is so easy to get a photo ID in Alabama, no one is prevented from voting'



A view of the Alabama State Capitol / Getty Images
BY: Joe Schoffstall
January 11, 2018 4:20 pm

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Alabama's voter identification law.

The lawsuit challenging Alabama's law was filed around the same time a larger voter ID campaign was underway in a number of states that was spearheaded by the Hillary Clinton campaign's top lawyer, Marc Elias.

The lawsuit, initially filed in Dec. 2015 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, was submitted on behalf of the Greater Birmingham Ministries and the Alabama State Conference of the NAACP. The suit challenged the constitutionality of the state's voter ID law and argued that the law discriminated against minorities and "immediately disenfranchised" 280,000 voters.

"For five decades, Alabama's use of discriminatory voting schemes has necessitated repeated federal intervention," the lawsuit read. "Now, Alabama again seeks to disfranchise thousands of African-American and Latino voters—all in the name of ‘curing' a voter fraud problem that does not exist."

U.S. District Judge L. Scott Coogler dismissed the suit on Wednesday by saying that there is not an undue burden placed on individuals who wish to vote. A person who does not have a photo identification is not prevented from casting a ballot because it is "so easy" to obtain one in Alabama, a portion of the court order reads. Photo IDs are available free of charge to residents of the state.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said the decision to dismiss the lawsuit was "without a doubt the right decision."

"Alabama's voter identification law is one of the broadest in the nation with procedures in place to allow anyone who does not have a photo ID to obtain one," said Marshall. "The court order makes the point exceedingly clear: ‘… a person who does not have a photo ID is not prevented from voting if he or she can easily get one, and it is so easy to get a photo ID in Alabama, no one is prevented from voting."

Elias, a partner at the Washington, D.C., law office of Perkins Coie who served as Clinton's top campaign lawyer, led a multi-state campaign against voter ID laws leading up to the 2016 elections. Elias filed the challenges in his personal capacity as a partner at Perkins Coie.

The challenges by Elias were bankrolled by millions of dollars from liberal billionaire George Soros, who set a goal of enlarging the electorate by 10 million voters, according to leaked documents.

Although Elias did not file the Alabama lawsuit, an attorney involved with the suit was a Clinton donor. Clinton also publicly backed the lawsuit against Alabama's voter ID law in late 2015 and referred to it as a "blast from the Jim Crow past."

"The right to vote is essential to our democracy, and so Hillary Clinton strongly supports the NAACP [Legal Defense and Educational Fund's] efforts to right the wrongs of Gov. Bentley and the Alabama Legislature," Maya Harris, the former senior policy adviser for the Clinton campaign, and the sister of Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.), said at the time.

The Alabama State Conference of the NAACP did not return a request for comment on the lawsuit's dismissal by press time.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/judge-tosses-naacp-lawsuit-challenging-alabamas-voter-id-law/
 
Denying reality. This is a classic case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. You are a proven liar and hypocrite. You lose again TARD.

Trumturd attacking others for 'denying reality'

Whatever happened to the 'millions of illegals' voted claim? Commission disbanded? LOL

Go back to Trump pedo University Con.
 
Back
Top