Conservative hero Roy Moore diddles 14 year old girls

[AAAintheBeltway]

I get confused. For decades libs have been lecturing us that private sexual matters have no relevance to choosing our leaders. After all, as Bill Clinton memorably rebuked Donna Shalala, we wouldn't have had JFK if we followed such a judgmental approach. Now suddenly it's critically important.

It's almost like they are hypocritical or something.

Folks, here's the truth. We are in tribal warfare and it's not going great for the American side. We have been betrayed by our own leaders and sold out by the opposition. They gloat about replacing us with immigrants from the flowering civilizations of Africa and Latin America. I really don't care what Judge Moore did 40 years ago, because he has proved beyond a shadow of doubt that he will not cuck out on us.

 

[Optionpro007]

If Kevin and Harvey ended up in the same jail cell, then Kevin might want to kill Harvey for totally ruining his life. But, if Kevin, Harvey, and O'Reilly, ended up in the same cell, then Harvey and Kevin would want to kill O'Reilly, since he was the first 'too big to fail,' but failed, sexual molester. Louis CK would probably want to kill them all...

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I get confused. For decades libs have been lecturing us that private sexual matters have no relevance to choosing our leaders.

And that is your excuse for defending someone who you tacitly acknowledge as a pedophile? You didn't dispute the allegation but rather only its relevance in the scheme of things.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Are you on medication? Link.

Let's work it the other way round. I am not running a remedial course here. You go and check what he said and report it here and then we will see what needs to be said.

Hint: I have a 100% clear and correct memory of what he said. You let me know when you do and then we will resume the discussion from there. Go ahead, make my day.

 

[UsualName]

Lets spell it out for the ever obtuse leftists among us. Weinstein and Spacey have acknowledged that something of sexual impropriety did in fact happen between them and their accusers. They are essentially guilty by their own admission. Moore, C.K., Sheen and others are not commenting, or making outright denials. That makes them, under our system of justice, innocent, until and unless found guilty in a court of law.
The media, more than happy to have trials and convictions in the court of public opinion are thrilled to appease the mob. This of course and nothing new, but should be of concern to all sane and rational people. If all it takes is an allegation to destroy someone politically, professionally, or personally without any real evidence brought forth, that my friend is a very scary world you're advocating.

I had a similar argument with another poster here where they just kept saying the same thing over and over.

So I’m going to end it here, th presumption of innocence only applies to a court of law. I read the story, it is well sourced and the accusers have similar stories in the same time period. That’s enough for Mitt Romney and me.

Personally, this is really a case study in how low can the GOP go. Pedophiles in the Senate House? Sure, I guess. It kind of works with the Trump vibe.

 

[CaptainObvious]

I had a similar argument with another poster here where they just kept saying the same thing over and over.

So I’m going to end it here, th presumption of innocence only applies to a court of law. I read the story, it is well sourced and the accusers have similar stories in the same time period. That’s enough for Mitt Romney and me.

Personally, this is really a case study in how low can the GOP go. Pedophiles in the Senate House? Sure, I guess. It kind of works with the Trump vibe.

Then you agree with those that accuse Clinton of treason and she should be in prison. Got it. And Obama is actually a Manchurian candidate from Africa. Hey, if you say so. The DNC, media and Clinton did really rig the primaries. That is the court of public opinion, even among many top democrats. Clinton, Comey and Lynch did conspire to keep Hillary from being prosecuted. Lot's of public opinion support that. Willfully ignorant, or just stupid, your acceptance of hearsay as fact is dangerous precedent to set.

 

[Tsing Tao]

I had a similar argument with another poster here where they just kept saying the same thing over and over.
.

Yeah, facts tend to be stubborn things.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Let's work it the other way round. I am not running a remedial course here. You go and check what he said and report it here and then we will see what needs to be said.

Hint: I have a 100% clear and correct memory of what he said. You let me know when you do and then we will resume the discussion from there. Go ahead, make my day.

Your "clear" memory aside, what Comey said about feeling nauseated had nothing to do with Bill Clinton and Lynch.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

...your acceptance of hearsay as fact is dangerous precedent to set.

Goose meet gander.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Your "clear" memory aside, what Comey said about feeling nauseated had nothing to do with Bill Clinton and Lynch.

Comey 100% said that he decided to move up his announcement about his findings in the case because of the Tarmac. 100% said he was disturbed by that. Which- just as I said- means that even Comey did not accept your bullshit dismissal of lynch and bubba by alleging that they intentionally did it in the open.

You stepped in it bigtime and are trying to walk sideways like a crab to get away from it.

Pretty cowardly.