Conservative Fox News to pay $90 million settlement for sexual harassment scandal

[exGOPer]

Well at least exGOPer gives you all of today's daily Democratic talking points all in one place as distinct, separate thread topics.

Why does it surprise me that the other fake peer review paper guy is out defending the fake peer review paper guy.

 

[jem]

it was claimed the paper was peer reviewed when I posted the article.
when challenged I looked it up. t was reviewed by peers... and the peers were listed.
but it was not in published in a peer reviewed journal. So I granted that it was not peer reviewed. But, you made claims about the berkeley earth paper being peer reviewed because it was published in a fake paid to play fraudulent journal.



so from now I am calling your claim debunked and not debating this with you everytime.

You posted a fake paper claiming it was peer reviewed when it was not, I never posted a fake paper claiming it was peer reviewed.

Your beloved Breitbart is a Nazi site, even Mercer distanced himself from it, try reading a few comments or articles on that site.

Breitbart was jewish and he is dead, he would be ashamed of what the site has become.

And regarding your Clinton evidence, maybe you should tell it to Trump's DOJ and the FBI and the Republican committees who refuse to buy this 'evidence' to even start an investigation. Putin isn't dumb to pay hundreds and millions of dollars for something he has in excess of.

 

[exGOPer]

it was claimed the paper was peer reviewed when I posted the article.
when challenged I looked it up. t was reviewed by peers... and the peers were listed.
but it was not in published in a peer reviewed journal. So I granted that it was not peer reviewed. But, you made claims about the berkeley earth paper being peer reviewed because it was published in a fake paid to play fraudulent journal.



so from now I am calling your claimed debunked and not debating this with you everytime.

Bunch of 'scientists' putting their name on a paper when they dont even mention it on their home pages doesn't mean that the paper is either scientific or was peer reviewed. It was completely fake and Breitbart is still claiming it was peer reviewed.

As for your other BS claim, here is Berkley peer reviewed paper

https://www.scitechnol.com/new-esti...mperature-spanning-to-1eCc.php?article_id=450

Notice, it's not from a wordpress blog like your fake paper

 

[jem]

that is volume 1 issue 1 of a predatory pay to publish fake peer reviewed journal is it not?
I thought we already covered this. Or is that not the same article you tried to fake us out with last time.

oh yeah...

its on the list of predatory journals... https://beallslist.weebly.com/
you crack me up with your bullshit.

its seems you are always wrong.
did you take over that handle from a previous troll who forgot?

Bunch of 'scientists' putting their name on a paper when they dont even mention it on their home pages doesn't mean that the paper is either scientific or was peer reviewed. It was completely fake and Breitbart is still claiming it was peer reviewed.

As for your other BS claim, here is Berkley peer reviewed paper

https://www.scitechnol.com/new-esti...mperature-spanning-to-1eCc.php?article_id=450

Notice, it's not from a wordpress blog like your fake paper

 

[gwb-trading]

that is volume 1 issue 1 of a predatory pay to publish fake peer reviewed journal from india is it not?
I thought we already covered this. Or is that not the same article you tried to fake us out with last time.

For only 1000 rupees you can be published in the "peer-reviewed" journal as well.

 

[exGOPer]

that is volume 1 issue 1 of a predatory pay to publish fake peer reviewed journal is it not?
I thought we already covered this. Or is that not the same article you tried to fake us out with last time.

oh yeah...

its on the list of predatory journals... https://beallslist.weebly.com/
you crack me up with your bullshit.

its seems you are always wrong.
did you take over that handle from a previous troll who forgot?

Oh so it's 'possibly' predatory in your book and that doesn't mean it's peer reviewed? If it was so easy to get peer reviewed then why didn't your fake paper even try that?


Here it is being cited by other papers

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927814000045

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cites=15303837368521670936&as_sdt=5

Or that is all fake too?

You make me laugh with your pathetic research skills.

And I am always wrong? Says the Libya is in Middle East guy. And I caught you lying about that paper didn't I. More projection from Cons.

 

[jem]

you article was published in a predatory fake peer reviewed journal. you pretended it was peer reviewed.
and you are so full of shit... you know I did not say that about libya while you did say moscow was not in europe. you are such a troll.



now you are citing science direct...
sciencedirect published this paper...

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658


Highlights
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5–10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature. ► Changes in ocean temperatures explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980. ► Changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.

Oh so it's 'possibly' predatory in your book and that doesn't mean it's peer reviewed? If it was so easy to get peer reviewed then why didn't your fake paper even try that?


Here it is being cited by other papers

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927814000045

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cites=15303837368521670936&as_sdt=5

Or that is all fake too?

You make me laugh with your pathetic research skills.

And I am always wrong? Says the Libya is in Middle East guy. And I caught you lying about that paper didn't I. More projection from Cons.

 

[exGOPer]

you article was published in a predatory fake peer reviewed journal. you pretended it was peer reviewed.
and you are so full of shit... you know I did not say that about libya while you did say moscow was not in europe. you are such a troll.



now you are citing science direct...
sciencedirect published this paper...

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658


Highlights
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5–10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature. ► Changes in ocean temperatures explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980. ► Changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.

Your list claims it's POSSIBLY predatory, you are declaring it as a fact and changing goal posts. It is peer reviewed, now you are claiming that peer review isn't good enough which is why I showed you how many time it has been cited in other papers. The only troll here is you, who posts Nazi propaganda and tries to pretend it was peer reviewed, you peddled Seth Rich conspiracy theories, your scientific credentials are in the Libya of Middle East.

 

[jem]

I am done with countering each one of our lies. I deny all of your lies. Everything you post is a lie and has been debunked or is criminally ignorant.


quote for exGOPer:

"And Moscow isn't in Europe, that's the stupidest thing I have read from you, that's like saying Moscow in Asia because parts of Europe are in Asia."