Quote from Rabbitone:
I see you like Martingale methods to handle consecutive losses. Where Martingale is the position sizing system that includes doubling position sizes after each loss. The idea behind it is no trader can lose a series of consecutive trades as the market will reverse at any time. By doubling the position size, a winning trade can thus recover previous loses and can yield profit.
My understanding is to use a Martingale system the trader would need a virtually unlimited supply of money so that he/she can remain alive in market till he/she wins. Also there is chance of margin call if trades are done using borrowed money.
Anti-martingale is just opposite to martingale system. Here the trader doubles his position size after every trade he wins. The idea is to maximize the chance of profit in a bullish market. Like martingale IMHO it is also a risky practice as traders can lose more than their accumulated profit amount by losing on only one trade.
I see both martingale and anti-martingale as advanced position sizing strategies, which can be used to win trades and/or to maximize profit from trades. But from the average traders prosepective (IMHO) both are high-risk money mangement, that are not at all suited for inexperienced traders and average traders with low risk tolerance, and need very strict money management methods. It would not take much to have this get out of hand for the average trader (IMHO).
forex....