Cons fall for satirical story again, cry about conspiracy in Alabama

Were 'Black People in Birmingham' Caught Voting Multiple Times With Fake IDs?
A so-called "satire" site published a story falsely claiming black voters committed fraud in Alabama's special election.

On 13 December 2017, a self-described “satire” site posted a story falsely reporting that black voters in Alabama had committed fraud by voting multiple times during a special election the night before, in which Democratic candidate Doug Jones beat Republican Roy Moore in a closely-watched and hotly-contested fight for the Senate seat left vacant by United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

The web site called ReaganWasRight.com reported:

The FEC has announced that it may have to recommend invalidating more than 60K votes from the Birmingham area to the Alabama Secretary of State. according to police logs, poll watchers and a watchdog group from the Heritage Foundation, dozens of people were caught voting multiple times with fake IDs and fake voter registrations.

The problem came to light as one poll watcher witnessed the same two men, who were obviously twins, return to the polls wearing different hats to vote at least four times. When confronted, the two men pushed their way through the crowd and ran.

Nothing about this story is true — if readers scroll to the bottom of the page it bears a label declaring itself “satire,” although whether one finds its content funny is, of course, subjective:


The web site ReaganWasRight.com is associated with a network of sites run by Christopher Blair, who writes under various pseudonyms, including “Flagg Eagleton.” Although the stories on his sites (which include The Last Line of Defense, Freedum Junkshun, and As American As Apple Pie) are labeled “satire,” they contain content many readers mistake as real, particularly when they are picked up and run by bottom-feeder aggregator sites that display no such labels or caveats.

The article in question is a compilation of slopped-together information that has no bearing in reality. The Federal Election Commission oversees campaign finance, but it has no role to play in voting, voter access, or ballots. The “quote” supposedly taken from a Breitbart.com report is falsified. According to the Alabama Secretary of State’s office (which does oversee voting and ballots), there have been no reports of widespread voter fraud.

In late October 2017, Blair apologized for another racially-charged story posted on Freedum Junkshun, which falsely reported U.S. Army Sgt. La David Johnson, the “black soldier” who was killed in action along with three others when their patrol was ambushed in Niger, was a deserter.

https://www.snopes.com/birmingham-caught-voting-multiple-times/


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...tories-of-voter-fraud/?utm_term=.70eb53ad58cc

Explanation of their behavior here - https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...rongly-linked-to-right-wing-attitudes.316043/





 
Now we know there are some younger right people here who are "low effort thinkers" however there are other things...

Why the elderly fall victim to scams: Blame the aging brain

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/lif...o-scams-blame-the-aging-brain/article5960753/

Shelley Taylor's elderly aunt was once deceived into buying "diamond" earrings through the mail. They turned out to be cheap glass. Taylor's father was conned out of a significant sum of money when he was in his mid-70s by a seemingly "nice man," who accompanied him to the bank to withdraw the cash. As he later found out, the man was anything but nice.

Others might have smelled a scam a mile away, but as with many older people, their ability to detect deception was askew.

Law enforcement experts and con artists have long known the elderly are particularly vulnerable to financial swindles, from bogus charities to investment scams. Now Taylor, a distinguished professor of psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and her fellow researchers have made an important discovery that could explain why.


In a new study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, they found that an area of the brain called the anterior insula, which helps alert us to dishonesty, is less active in older adults than in younger people. In the first part of their study, the researchers asked participants in two separate age groups – one between the ages of 55 and 84, and the other averaging 23 years of age – to judge the trustworthiness of a series of faces shown in photographs.

While both groups reacted the same way to photos of faces that were intentionally selected for their trustworthy and neutral expressions, the older adults were more inclined to rate untrustworthy faces, characterized by insincere smiles and averted eyes, as reliable and approachable.


"Most of the older adults showed this effect," Taylor said in a press release. "They missed facial cues that are pretty easily distinguished."

The researchers then monitored participants' brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging, while they rated similar photographs. The anterior insula, which is involved in forming instincts or gut reactions, was found to be active in younger adults as they made their judgments, but not in the older participants.

"The older adults do not have as strong an anterior insula early-warning signal; their brains are not saying 'be wary,' as the brains of the younger adults are," Taylor said. "It's not that younger adults are better at finance or judging whether an investment is good; they're better at discerning whether a person is potentially trustworthy when cues are communicated visually."

The old and the young would be wise to heed her advice for avoiding scams: Hang up on telephone solicitors and avoid pushy salespeople and free lunch seminars offering investment pitches. "I'm not saying that all of these are fraudulent," she said, "but the best thing that you can do if your brain isn't helping you to make these discriminations is not to have to make them."
 
That Anterior Insula deficiency again eh?

The secret of Trump's success.

Moore still hasn't conceded based on this kind of crap, if it wasn't for Weiner and the Comey letter, Trump wouldn't have squeaked by either. At least both of them got their karma coming and Mueller is gonna take care of the Russian stooge soon.
 
Back
Top