Confusion about the deficit

Quote from BSAM:

I suppose that it is safe to assume that, sometime in the very near future, the liberals will be "teaching" us that the north pole is really the south pole and that the south pole is really the north pole.
Earth's Magnetic Poles May
Be About To Switch
By Paul Simons
The Guardian - London
7-6-2

The Earth could be about to turn upside down. The planet's magnetic field is showing signs of wanting to make a gigantic somersault, so that magnetic north heads towards Antarctica, and magnetic south goes north. Compasses will point the wrong way, and migrating birds, fish and turtles are going to be very confused.

Just when this will happen, how long it will take and what the consequences will be, is difficult to fathom. What is not in doubt, though, is that it will happen.
http://www.rense.com/general26/poles.htm
 
Quote from Mercor:

Earth's Magnetic Poles May
Be About To Switch
By Paul Simons
The Guardian - London
7-6-2

The Earth could be about to turn upside down. The planet's magnetic field is showing signs of wanting to make a gigantic somersault, so that magnetic north heads towards Antarctica, and magnetic south goes north. Compasses will point the wrong way, and migrating birds, fish and turtles are going to be very confused.

Just when this will happen, how long it will take and what the consequences will be, is difficult to fathom. What is not in doubt, though, is that it will happen.
http://www.rense.com/general26/poles.htm

LOL
 
Quote from Mav88:

I'm saying give me the evidence that big government and academics know what the hell they are doing before quoting me some article as the supporting evidence for yet another government program.

Everything that has transpired to date indicates this type of thing is bullocks, therefore the burden is on you, Laura, and Brad to show otherwise
Now that is a fair point. As we can see today, the experts do make errors. Undoubtedly they will again.

So for evidence, what do you need? Examples from our own history which demonstrate that government spending on the private sector, during a balance sheet recession, in an environment where significant capital is idle, created jobs and got a virtuous circle of consuming and supplying going again?
 
Now that is a fair point. As we can see today, the experts do make errors. Undoubtedly they will again.

Errors? Mistyping libiral, that's an error, what we are talking about is a fundamentally flawed way of approaching economic policy.


So for evidence, what do you need? Examples from our own history which demonstrate that government spending on the private sector, during a balance sheet recession, in an environment where significant capital is idle, created jobs and got a virtuous circle of consuming and supplying going again?
How about all the failures, such as Obama's stimulus, have you assesed them? How could you know that this isn't another 'error'?
 
Quote from jem:

This is a teachable moment.

The ridiculous spending causes massive inflation.
Massive inflation...

http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/


Has our economy really grown in the last 20 years.
I think so...

<img src="http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/usgs_line.php?title=US%20Gross%20Domestic%20Product%20GDP%20History&year=1950_2010&sname=US&units=b&bar=0&stack=1&size=m&col=c&spending0=293.7_339.3_358.3_379.3_380.4_414.7_437.4_461.1_467.2_506.6_526.4_544.8_585.7_617.8_663.6_719.1_787.7_832.4_909.8_984.4_1038.3_1126.8_1237.9_1382.3_1499.5_1637.7_1824.6_2030.1_2293.8_2562.2_2788.1_3126.8_3253.2_3534.6_3930.9_4217.5_4460.1_4736.4_5100.4_5482.1_5800.5_5992.1_6342.3_6667.4_7085.2_7414.7_7838.5_8332.4_8793.5_9353.5_9951.5_10286.2_10642.3_11142.2_11853.3_12623_13377.2_14028.7_14369.1_13939_14526.5">

and

<img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cOLHaJP2uBw/TaEkvR06ZrI/AAAAAAAAPLI/23zHYVsID7s/s400/productivity.gif">
"The chart above shows the "Productivity change in the nonfarm
business sector, 1947-2010" (Source: BLS).... Instead of the
"Great Stagnation," maybe we're in the "Great Accelerating
Productivity Surge"?"">

Has any of this spending done anything useful since the fall of the berlin wall? Have standards of living decreased. Does it take two incomes to own a house in a good school district where one was once enough? All this govt spending and look what happens to our standard of living? We have crowded out entire sectors of the economy with a larger govt sector.

Given the growth of GDP, and particularly productivity, one would think the working man's lot would have improved over the past 30 years, but it has not. Why? Because he has to OWN those things to receive the benefits of those things. As for two incomes, that started with the surge of consumerism, families want more stuff and it takes two to get it. Is that all of the reason? No--see my point above about ownership.

Crowding out... a real possibility, it does occur. How to discover likely environments? Interest rates are one way:

<img src="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1790-Present.gif">

Big competition for money back in the 80s, but we knew that. Lately? Nothing out of the ordinary.

Essentially the baby boomers spending has been robbing from every generation to support their habit of never paying the piper.

They inflated out of their parents savings bonds.
They had the govt spend their asses off for the last 30 years.
They have saddled our children with some estimates of 900,000 dollars each of debt.

And now when it is time to tighten the belt... they say no no no spend more. Really screw our kids with massive debt and massive inflation.

As if our kids are not going to have it tough enough after these greedy bastards ship all our tech and jobs over sees so they could buy cheap shit at wall mart.

Balance the budget... have a recession.. build from a real base instead a from a base of fanancial tricks.

disclosure... I am a baby boomer.
They inflated, yes, but as the history indicates, at an easy to take rate, ie. a targeted rate. The alternative? Playing with deflation, or at least everyone just sitting on capital.
Spending has been rising, yes, and one could (and many do) argue that our entitlements have grown too large, though clearly that's mainly a cultural "norm" argument, until the mathematics, which we're discussing, indicate differently. Belt tightening? It works for a family budget, because ordinarily cutting spending doesn't mean the wage earners of that family have their pay cut as a further result of those spending cuts. For the government budget, during a demand-constrained recession (to put it another way), cutting spending basically does nothing more than reduce sales which immediately cuts income, hence, the death spiral. Maybe those sales need to be reduced, we'll look to interest rates for signs of excessive competition from government.

Greedy bastards shipping jobs overseas? Those are responsible corporate decisions based on the mandate to return to investors. I don't entirely like those rules, I'd like to change those rules, but they are the rules today.

Edit: sorry about the wide chart, I hate side-scrolling.
 
Ridiculous article. Riddled with faulty assumptions.

1.The first one being... assume the debt is never paid off.
2. The second being debt has not remained a constant share of GDP.
3. Suppose all the debt is owned domestically...

and more.

Plus, it sort of admits govt sector could crowd out. I think it neglects the insidious tax and destruction of standard of living which is inflation.


Quote from Ricter:

Yes it is.

Saturday, 26 May 2012
"Government debt and the burden on future generations "

http://mainlymacro.blogspot.ca/2012/05/government-debt-and-burden-on-future.html

This is important to consider, what you've mentioned, that our children will have to pay this debt... our immediate children? Not exactly...
 
1. you don't believe those inflation numbers do you.
gas, food, and everything you spend money on have been taken out of the inflation numbers.

Using the 1980 measure we are averaging 10 percent inflation a year.

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts

2. If you put GDP in real terms it is negative...

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/gross-domestic-product-charts

This spending and these policies have really destroyed our economy.
Now we got fools like Krugman saying spend more.

25 years of no growth.
Have we not had enough over spending yet?





Quote from Ricter:

Massive inflation...

http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/


I think so...

<img src="http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/usgs_line.php?title=US%20Gross%20Domestic%20Product%20GDP%20History&year=1950_2010&sname=US&units=b&bar=0&stack=1&size=m&col=c&spending0=293.7_339.3_358.3_379.3_380.4_414.7_437.4_461.1_467.2_506.6_526.4_544.8_585.7_617.8_663.6_719.1_787.7_832.4_909.8_984.4_1038.3_1126.8_1237.9_1382.3_1499.5_1637.7_1824.6_2030.1_2293.8_2562.2_2788.1_3126.8_3253.2_3534.6_3930.9_4217.5_4460.1_4736.4_5100.4_5482.1_5800.5_5992.1_6342.3_6667.4_7085.2_7414.7_7838.5_8332.4_8793.5_9353.5_9951.5_10286.2_10642.3_11142.2_11853.3_12623_13377.2_14028.7_14369.1_13939_14526.5">

and

<img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cOLHaJP2uBw/TaEkvR06ZrI/AAAAAAAAPLI/23zHYVsID7s/s400/productivity.gif">
"The chart above shows the "Productivity change in the nonfarm
business sector, 1947-2010" (Source: BLS).... Instead of the
"Great Stagnation," maybe we're in the "Great Accelerating
Productivity Surge"?"">



Given the growth of GDP, and particularly productivity, one would think the working man's lot would have improved over the past 30 years, but it has not. Why? Because he has to OWN those things to receive the benefits of those things. As for two incomes, that started with the surge of consumerism, families want more stuff and it takes two to get it. Is that all of the reason? No--see my point above about ownership.

Crowding out... a real possibility, it does occur. How to discover likely environments? Interest rates are one way:

<img src="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1790-Present.gif">

Big competition for money back in the 80s, but we knew that. Lately? Nothing out of the ordinary.


They inflated, yes, but as the history indicates, at an easy to take rate, ie. a targeted rate. The alternative? Playing with deflation, or at least everyone just sitting on capital.
Spending has been rising, yes, and one could (and many do) argue that our entitlements have grown too large, though clearly that's mainly a cultural "norm" argument, until the mathematics, which we're discussing, indicate differently. Belt tightening? It works for a family budget, because ordinarily cutting spending doesn't mean the wage earners of that family have their pay cut as a further result of those spending cuts. For the government budget, during a demand-constrained recession (to put it another way), cutting spending basically does nothing more than reduce sales which immediately cuts income, hence, the death spiral. Maybe those sales need to be reduced, we'll look to interest rates for signs of excessive competition from government.

Greedy bastards shipping jobs overseas? Those are responsible corporate decisions based on the mandate to return to investors. I don't entirely like those rules, I'd like to change those rules, but they are the rules today.

Edit: sorry about the wide chart, I hate side-scrolling.
 
Quote from Ricter:

This is a rock-solid piece that summarizes the current situation well (imo of course. : ))



Actually it's a fucking fairy tale intended to keep people like you living in never never land.
 
Quote from Mercor:

Earth's Magnetic Poles May
Be About To Switch
By Paul Simons
The Guardian - London
7-6-2

The Earth could be about to turn upside down. The planet's magnetic field is showing signs of wanting to make a gigantic somersault, so that magnetic north heads towards Antarctica, and magnetic south goes north. Compasses will point the wrong way, and migrating birds, fish and turtles are going to be very confused.

Just when this will happen, how long it will take and what the consequences will be, is difficult to fathom. What is not in doubt, though, is that it will happen.
http://www.rense.com/general26/poles.htm

Nothing taxing rich people can't solve.
 
Back
Top