I've concluded dude's just trolling, this baiting is weak sauce, no one's this aggressively stupid. Back to ignore he goes.
Confirmed - experimental gene therapy COVID shots
- Thread starter LacesOut
- Start date
LOoooooool.
There is a reason why they study this, you momo.
Because confirmation of reverse transcription of Pfizer clot shot to DNA in liver cells means you are just one step away from integration into the host genome.
And in science, unlike in lesbian dance theory which I’m sure you are an expert at, you can make reasonable hypothesis such as: WHY ARE we seeing Intracellular accumulation of LNP in hepatocytes? Why are there case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis after BNT162b2 injection? Why is liver injury seen in Vivo in rats and mice who undergo Pfizer injection?
you need to go back to OrangeManBad theory. Talking science to you is like discussing the merits of technical analysis with a pig (like your mom).
So you admit you were guessing, and cancer cells changing DNA is ancient science, how is that one step away from healthy cells?
Do you understand what you posted or you just copy pasted from your boomer facebook group?
Do you not understand how science works? Cancer cells changing DNA is ancient science. Lol.
Your background in science is what? Nothing.
You think Alden et al spent months on this study so Starbucks baristas like you can find a website ‘debooonking’?
You have zero idea what’s going on. ZERO.
But you do have AIDS.
Your study that you linked to used cancerous cells, how is that proof that normal human cells are being altered?
Post the exact quote from the study.
It isn't it's just garbage started by epoch times.
More importantly, the study never showed that the reverse-transcribed DNA integrated into the cell’s genome. “[T]here is no evidence presented [in the study showing] that the mRNA is integrated into the genome of the host cells,” Parry said. “There is no high-throughput sequencing of the Huh7 cell line and no evidence of other conventional methods of detection of [genomic] DNA such as Southern blot.”
Indeed, Aldén et al. even acknowledged the same in the study, writing that “At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome.”
Other scientists, such as surgeon and cancer researcher David Gorski, pointed out additional issues with the study, such as the fact that the experimental system used by Aldén et al. is artificial. It involved a cancer cell line, which isn’t representative of normal cells. Cancer cells are also more likely to overexpress LINE-1 compared to healthy cells. Furthermore, the amount of vaccine used in the experiment (2 micrograms/mL of vaccine to 200,000 cells) is much higher than the amount that adults receive through vaccination (30 micrograms per person).
https://healthfeedback.org/claimrev...ovid-19-mrna-vaccines-change-dna-epoch-times/
https://www.chop.edu/news/feature-article-no-study-does-not-prove-what-you-think-it-does-part3
No. Read the study yourself. You won’t understand it but you may learn something.
You don’t understand the purpose of these studies. One study isn’t proof. It’s just more damning evidence of the danger posed by these therapeutics.
And the more studies you get to show unexpected and damaging results makes your hypothesis clearer and clearer.
This study was done in vitro…but who cares? Let’s just discount it if it provides the wrong result.
Please show a study that shows no damage is done to the liver by the vaccine. I’ll show you one that it does. Accumulate enough studies on one side and you are making a strong case. Most important - Are those studies replicable? Then they are more valid.
LOL.
YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF THESE STUDIES. STOP GOOGLING NONSENSE.
You completely ignored that the study was done on cancerous cells, where is your answer for that? Why haven't the studies been replicated in normal human cells?
Then you will wonder why they weren’t done using heart cells.
Do you have the foggiest idea of why they used HUH?