Comrade John Brennan's security clearance has been revoked

T

TreeFrogTrader

As it should be.

I am sure that that is yet another reason why Don Lemon and Shep Smith will have severe butt-hurt. Mind you, it is not the only reason but since this is a family forum, I will not mention the other reasons.


And yes there are a dozen more security risks/traitors that need to have theirs revoked pronto, but he is a good place to start, along with Clapper.
 
Triggered! :D

DepGy9QWkAE0jLv - Copy.jpg
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
Seriously. The only justification for his keeping it was to advise the current administration. Thanks, we don't want your advice.
More...
John Brennan supported, and voted for, Gus Hall, the Communist party's perennial candidate. It's no wonder he is anti-Trump and anti-American as are miscreants/liars like ExtraGoatRoper, Shartfartandrunfast, Unusuallylame, Phoneysnark and Bearwithouthoney.
 
Last edited:
I just looked this up to see if it was true...

per wikipedia.


While riding a bus to class at Fordham, he saw an ad in The New York Times that said the CIA was recruiting. He decided that a CIA career would be a good match for his "wanderlust" and his desire for public service.[5]During his application to the CIA he admitted in a lie-detector test that he had voted for the U.S. Communist Party candidate for president, Gus Hall, in 1976. He explained to the interviewer that his vote was a way of "signaling my unhappiness with the system," and he later described his vote as a protest against partisanship of the Watergate era.[18] He emphasized after leaving office that his entry into the CIA showed that freedom of speech in the U.S. does not disqualify a person for a career in government.[19]
 
TJustice said:
I just looked this up to see if it was true...

per wikipedia.


that his entry into the CIA showed that freedom of speech in the U.S. does not disqualify a person for a career in government.[19]
More...


The exercise of the freedom of speech does not and should not disqualify you. The content of the speech however could be problematic.
 
Voting for a Communist makes you a massive risk.
I would never trust a person who voted for a Communist with that kind of access and I don't think our govt should have ever trusted him like that either.

It would be like allowing a person whose family runs the muslim brotherhood to be the top aide and lover and handler of National secrets for the Secretary of State.

What is the point of national security if our top secret info is so insecure and then the FBI covers it up?

What is wrong with our government. Its beyond a hollywood parody, it's so wrong.
TreeFrogTrader said:
The exercise of the freedom of speech does not and should not disqualify you. The content of the speech however could be problematic.
More...
 
Last edited:
TJustice said:
Voting for a Communist makes you a massive risk.
I would never trust a person who voted for a Communist with that kind of access and I don't think our govt should have ever trusted him like that.

It would be like allowing a person whose family runs the muslim brotherhood to be the top aide and lover and handler of personal secrets for the Secretary of State.

What is the point of national security if our top secret info is so insecure and then the FBI covers it up?

What is wrong with our government. Its beyond a hollywood parody its so wrong.
More...

If you work for any intelligence agency of the US but, your loyalties are to a communist country then, you are a security risk. Just for the fact that you disagree with the form of government of the US would give you all the incentive to sabotage and try to destroy the US from within! That fact alone should disqualify anyone whose loyalty is not to the US! All US citizens swear to defend the US from within and outside threats so, why should working for the intelligence agencies handling classified data exempt anyone?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top